lack: affect ability study

Related concepts

Parents	factor Weight: 0.64 , reason Weight: 0.61 , ability Weight: 0.61 , symptom Weight: 0.61
Siblings	absence Weight: 0.64 , poor people Weight: 0.60 , apathy Weight: 0.34 , laziness Weight: 0.34 , characteristic Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
affect ability study	1.00
impair performance	0.77
affect system	0.77
affect function	0.77
affect risk	0.77
affect attributes	0.76
affect life	0.76
affects behavior	0.76
affect business	0.76
affect performance	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(factor, affect business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(lack, affect ability study)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(lack, affect ability study) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(factor, affect business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(lack, affect ability study) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(factor, affect business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(lack, affect ability study) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Remarkable(laziness, affect life)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(lack, affect ability study) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(characteristic, affect attributes)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(factor, affect business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

Remarkable(lack, affect ability study) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(lack, affect ability study)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(lack, affect ability study) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

Remarkable(characteristic, affect attributes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Plausible(characteristic, affect attributes)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(lack, affect ability study) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

Remarkable(laziness, affect life) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Plausible(laziness, affect life)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(lack, affect ability study) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Salient(lack, affect ability study)

Similarity expansion

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.82

Typical(lack, affect ability study) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(lack, affects behavior)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.82

Typical(lack, affect ability study) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Typical(lack, affect system)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.82

Typical(lack, affect ability study) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Typical(lack, impair performance)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.82

Typical(lack, affect ability study) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Typical(lack, affect risk)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(lack, affect ability study) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(lack, affects behavior)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(lack, affect ability study) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Plausible(lack, affect system)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.78

Salient(lack, affect ability study) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Salient(lack, affect risk)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(lack, affect ability study) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Plausible(lack, affect risk)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.78

Salient(lack, affect ability study) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Salient(lack, affect system)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.78

Salient(lack, affect ability study) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Salient(lack, affects behavior)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(lack, affect ability study) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Plausible(lack, impair performance)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.82

Typical(lack, affect ability study) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(lack, affect performance)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.78

Salient(lack, affect ability study) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Salient(lack, impair performance)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.78

Salient(lack, affect ability study) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Salient(lack, affect performance)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(lack, affect ability study) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(lack, affect performance)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.52

Remarkable(lack, affect ability study) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(lack, affect risk)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.52

Remarkable(lack, affect ability study) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(lack, affect performance)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.52

Remarkable(lack, affect ability study) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(lack, affect system)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.52

Remarkable(lack, affect ability study) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(lack, impair performance)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.52

Remarkable(lack, affect ability study) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(lack, affects behavior)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.78

Salient(lack, affect ability study) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(lack, affect ability study) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(lack, affect ability study)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(lack, affect ability study) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(lack, affect ability study)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(lack, affect ability study) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(factor, affect business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(lack, affect ability study) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Typical(characteristic, affect attributes)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(lack, affect ability study) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Typical(laziness, affect life)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.82

Typical(lack, affect ability study) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(factor, affect business)