lack: impair performance

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.64
, reason
Weight: 0.61
, ability
Weight: 0.61
, symptom
Weight: 0.61
Siblings absence
Weight: 0.64
, poor people
Weight: 0.60
, apathy
Weight: 0.34
, laziness
Weight: 0.34
, characteristic
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
impair performance 1.00
impair athletic performance 0.92
affect performance 0.83
affect cognitive function 0.77
affect ability study 0.77
affect function 0.76
affect sports performance 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(ability, affect sports performance)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(lack, impair performance)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(lack, impair performance)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(ability, affect sports performance)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(lack, impair performance)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(ability, affect sports performance)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(ability, affect sports performance)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(lack, impair performance)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(lack, impair performance)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(lack, impair performance)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(lack, impair performance)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(lack, impair performance)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(lack, impair athletic performance)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(lack, impair performance)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(lack, affect performance)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(lack, impair performance)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(lack, affect ability study)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(lack, impair performance)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(lack, affect sports performance)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(lack, impair performance)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(lack, affect cognitive function)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(lack, impair performance)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(lack, impair athletic performance)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(lack, impair performance)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(lack, affect performance)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(lack, impair performance)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(lack, affect cognitive function)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(lack, impair performance)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(lack, affect cognitive function)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(lack, impair performance)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(lack, affect cognitive function)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(lack, impair performance)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(lack, affect ability study)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(lack, impair performance)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(lack, affect performance)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(lack, impair performance)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(lack, affect sports performance)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(lack, impair performance)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(lack, impair athletic performance)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(lack, impair performance)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(lack, affect performance)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(lack, impair performance)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(lack, affect ability study)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(lack, impair performance)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(lack, affect sports performance)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(lack, impair performance)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(lack, impair athletic performance)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(lack, impair performance)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(lack, affect ability study)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(lack, impair performance)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(lack, affect sports performance)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(lack, impair performance)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(lack, impair performance)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(lack, impair performance)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(lack, impair performance)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(lack, impair performance)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(lack, impair performance)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(ability, affect sports performance)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(lack, impair performance)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(ability, affect sports performance)