lack: affect performance

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.64
, reason
Weight: 0.61
, ability
Weight: 0.61
, symptom
Weight: 0.61
Siblings absence
Weight: 0.64
, poor people
Weight: 0.60
, apathy
Weight: 0.34
, laziness
Weight: 0.34
, characteristic
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect performance 1.00
affect sports performance 0.90
impair performance 0.83
predict performance 0.82
impair athletic performance 0.80
affect results 0.80
affect ability study 0.76
affect behavior 0.75
affect atp 0.75
affect system 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(ability, affect sports performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(lack, affect performance)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(ability, predict performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(lack, affect performance)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(lack, affect performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(ability, predict performance)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(lack, affect performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(ability, affect sports performance)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(lack, affect performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(ability, affect sports performance)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(lack, affect performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(ability, predict performance)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(ability, affect sports performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(lack, affect performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(lack, affect performance)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(ability, predict performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(lack, affect performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(lack, affect performance)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(lack, affect performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(lack, affect performance)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(lack, affect performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(lack, affect sports performance)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(lack, affect performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(lack, impair performance)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(lack, affect performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(lack, affect behavior)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(lack, affect performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(lack, affect system)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(lack, affect performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(lack, affect atp)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(lack, affect performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(lack, impair performance)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(lack, affect performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(lack, affect behavior)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(lack, affect performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(lack, affect sports performance)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(lack, affect performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(lack, affect system)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(lack, affect performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(lack, affect system)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(lack, affect performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(lack, impair performance)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(lack, affect performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(lack, affect atp)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(lack, affect performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(lack, affect behavior)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(lack, affect performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(lack, affect results)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(lack, affect performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(lack, affect sports performance)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(lack, affect performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(lack, affect atp)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(lack, affect performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(lack, affect results)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(lack, affect performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(lack, affect sports performance)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(lack, affect performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(lack, affect results)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(lack, affect performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(lack, affect results)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(lack, affect performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(lack, affect ability study)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(lack, affect performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(lack, impair athletic performance)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(lack, affect performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(lack, impair athletic performance)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(lack, affect performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(lack, impair athletic performance)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(lack, affect performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(lack, affect ability study)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(lack, affect performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(lack, impair athletic performance)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(lack, affect performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(lack, affect ability study)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(lack, affect performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(lack, affect ability study)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(lack, affect performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(lack, impair performance)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(lack, affect performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(lack, affect system)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(lack, affect performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(lack, affect atp)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(lack, affect performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(lack, affect behavior)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(lack, affect performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(lack, affect performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(lack, affect performance)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(lack, affect performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(lack, affect performance)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(lack, affect performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(ability, predict performance)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(lack, affect performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(ability, affect sports performance)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(lack, affect performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(ability, predict performance)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(lack, affect performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(ability, affect sports performance)