lake: be at michigan

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents freshwater
Weight: 0.64
, valley
Weight: 0.63
, spring
Weight: 0.62
, salt water
Weight: 0.61
Siblings great salt lake
Weight: 0.80
, marsh
Weight: 0.59
, creek
Weight: 0.56
, crater
Weight: 0.50
, sea water
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at michigan 1.00
be at utah 0.86
be at florida 0.85
be at oklahoma 0.83
be at louisiana 0.80
be at west virginia 0.79
be at new mexico 0.78
be at montana 0.77
be at africa 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(valley, be at montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(lake, be at michigan)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(valley, be at west virginia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(lake, be at michigan)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(lake, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(valley, be at west virginia)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(lake, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(valley, be at montana)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(lake, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(valley, be at west virginia)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(lake, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(valley, be at montana)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(lake, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(marsh, be at florida)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(lake, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(marsh, be at louisiana)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(valley, be at west virginia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(lake, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(lake, be at michigan)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(valley, be at montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(lake, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(lake, be at michigan)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(lake, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(marsh, be at florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(marsh, be at florida)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(lake, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(marsh, be at louisiana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(marsh, be at louisiana)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(lake, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(lake, be at michigan)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(lake, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(lake, be at oklahoma)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(lake, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(lake, be at florida)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(lake, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(lake, be at utah)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(lake, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(lake, be at oklahoma)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(lake, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(lake, be at florida)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(lake, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(lake, be at utah)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(lake, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(lake, be at utah)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(lake, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(lake, be at florida)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(lake, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(lake, be at oklahoma)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(lake, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(lake, be at new mexico)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(lake, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(lake, be at utah)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(lake, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(lake, be at florida)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(lake, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(lake, be at oklahoma)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(lake, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(lake, be at new mexico)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(lake, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(lake, be at new mexico)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(lake, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(lake, be at africa)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(lake, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(lake, be at africa)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(lake, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(lake, be at africa)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(lake, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(lake, be at africa)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(lake, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(lake, be at new mexico)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(lake, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(lake, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(lake, be at michigan)

Typical implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(lake, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(lake, be at michigan)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(lake, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(valley, be at west virginia)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(lake, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(valley, be at montana)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(lake, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(marsh, be at florida)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(lake, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(marsh, be at louisiana)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(lake, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(valley, be at west virginia)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(lake, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(valley, be at montana)