valley: be at west virginia

Related concepts

Parents	river Weight: 0.62 , area Weight: 0.62 , tree Weight: 0.56 , thing Weight: 0.55 , place Weight: 0.52
Siblings	rift valley Weight: 0.74 , stream Weight: 0.56 , death valley Weight: 0.37 , greenwich village Weight: 0.34 , town Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be at west virginia	1.00
be at north america	0.86
be at michigan	0.79
be at utah	0.78
be at wisconsin	0.77
be at montana	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.21

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(river, be at north america) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(valley, be at west virginia)

0.18

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.11

Plausible(river, be at wisconsin) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(valley, be at west virginia)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(valley, be at west virginia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Plausible(river, be at north america)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(valley, be at west virginia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Plausible(river, be at wisconsin)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Remarkable(valley, be at west virginia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(river, be at north america)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Remarkable(valley, be at west virginia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(river, be at wisconsin)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Remarkable(valley, be at west virginia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(town, be at michigan)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Remarkable(valley, be at west virginia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(town, be at utah)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(river, be at north america) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

Remarkable(valley, be at west virginia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Plausible(valley, be at west virginia)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.11

Plausible(river, be at wisconsin) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

Remarkable(valley, be at west virginia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Plausible(valley, be at west virginia)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(valley, be at west virginia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

Remarkable(town, be at michigan) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Plausible(town, be at michigan)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(valley, be at west virginia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

Remarkable(town, be at utah) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Plausible(town, be at utah)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(valley, be at west virginia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Salient(valley, be at west virginia)

Similarity expansion

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(valley, be at west virginia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Plausible(valley, be at montana)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.18

Remarkable(valley, be at west virginia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Remarkable(valley, be at montana)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.20

Salient(valley, be at west virginia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Salient(valley, be at montana)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.72

Typical(valley, be at west virginia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(valley, be at montana)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.20

Salient(valley, be at west virginia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(valley, be at west virginia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Remarkable(valley, be at west virginia)

Typical implies Plausible

0.18

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(valley, be at west virginia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(valley, be at west virginia)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Remarkable(valley, be at west virginia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(river, be at north america)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Remarkable(valley, be at west virginia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(river, be at wisconsin)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Remarkable(valley, be at west virginia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Typical(town, be at utah)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Remarkable(valley, be at west virginia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(town, be at michigan)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.72

Typical(valley, be at west virginia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(river, be at north america)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.72

Typical(valley, be at west virginia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(river, be at wisconsin)