lake: was toupo in toupo formed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents reservoir
Weight: 0.70
, wetland
Weight: 0.68
, freshwater
Weight: 0.64
, valley
Weight: 0.63
Siblings lake champlain
Weight: 0.89
, lake tahoe
Weight: 0.87
, lake erie
Weight: 0.85
, great salt lake
Weight: 0.80
, lake constance
Weight: 0.79

Related properties

Property Similarity
was toupo in toupo formed 1.00
was formed 1.00
is formed 0.96
be formed 0.96
were formed 0.95
become formed 0.90
was created 0.84
were formed in countries 0.84
be formed from bodies 0.81
were formed in finland 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(wetland, be formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(lake, was toupo in toupo formed)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(valley, be formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(lake, was toupo in toupo formed)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(reservoir, be formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(lake, was toupo in toupo formed)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(valley, is formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(lake, was toupo in toupo formed)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(lake, was toupo in toupo formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(valley, is formed)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(lake, was toupo in toupo formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(reservoir, be formed)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(lake, was toupo in toupo formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(valley, be formed)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(lake, was toupo in toupo formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(wetland, be formed)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(lake, was toupo in toupo formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be formed)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(lake, was toupo in toupo formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(valley, be formed)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(lake, was toupo in toupo formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(reservoir, be formed)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(lake, was toupo in toupo formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(valley, is formed)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(lake, was toupo in toupo formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(lake tahoe, was formed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(wetland, be formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(lake, was toupo in toupo formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(lake, was toupo in toupo formed)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(valley, be formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(lake, was toupo in toupo formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(lake, was toupo in toupo formed)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(reservoir, be formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(lake, was toupo in toupo formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(lake, was toupo in toupo formed)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(valley, is formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(lake, was toupo in toupo formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(lake, was toupo in toupo formed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(lake, was toupo in toupo formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(lake tahoe, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(lake tahoe, was formed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(lake, was toupo in toupo formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(lake, was toupo in toupo formed)

Similarity expansion

0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(lake, was toupo in toupo formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(lake, were formed in finland)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(lake, was toupo in toupo formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(lake, be formed)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(lake, was toupo in toupo formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(lake, were formed in finland)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(lake, was toupo in toupo formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(lake, be formed)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(lake, was toupo in toupo formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(lake, were formed in finland)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(lake, was toupo in toupo formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(lake, be formed)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(lake, was toupo in toupo formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(lake, be formed)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(lake, was toupo in toupo formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(lake, were formed in finland)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(lake, was toupo in toupo formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(lake, was toupo in toupo formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(lake, was toupo in toupo formed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(lake, was toupo in toupo formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(lake, was toupo in toupo formed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(lake, was toupo in toupo formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(valley, is formed)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(lake, was toupo in toupo formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(reservoir, be formed)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(lake, was toupo in toupo formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(valley, be formed)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(lake, was toupo in toupo formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(wetland, be formed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(lake, was toupo in toupo formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(lake tahoe, was formed)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(lake, was toupo in toupo formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(valley, is formed)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(lake, was toupo in toupo formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(reservoir, be formed)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(lake, was toupo in toupo formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(valley, be formed)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(lake, was toupo in toupo formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(wetland, be formed)