lake: were formed in finland

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents reservoir
Weight: 0.70
, wetland
Weight: 0.68
, freshwater
Weight: 0.64
, valley
Weight: 0.63
Siblings lake champlain
Weight: 0.89
, lake tahoe
Weight: 0.87
, lake erie
Weight: 0.85
, great salt lake
Weight: 0.80
, lake constance
Weight: 0.79

Related properties

Property Similarity
were formed in finland 1.00
were formed 0.84
were formed in scandinavian countries 0.81
was toupo in toupo formed 0.81
was formed 0.81
be formed 0.80
is formed 0.79
were formed in countries 0.78
become formed 0.76
be formed from bodies 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(wetland, be formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(lake, were formed in finland)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(valley, be formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(lake, were formed in finland)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(reservoir, be formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(lake, were formed in finland)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(valley, is formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(lake, were formed in finland)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(lake, were formed in finland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(valley, is formed)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(lake, were formed in finland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(reservoir, be formed)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(lake, were formed in finland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(valley, be formed)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(lake, were formed in finland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(wetland, be formed)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(lake, were formed in finland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be formed)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(lake, were formed in finland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(valley, be formed)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(lake, were formed in finland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(reservoir, be formed)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(lake, were formed in finland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(valley, is formed)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(lake, were formed in finland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(lake tahoe, was formed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(wetland, be formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(lake, were formed in finland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(lake, were formed in finland)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(valley, be formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(lake, were formed in finland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(lake, were formed in finland)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(reservoir, be formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(lake, were formed in finland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(lake, were formed in finland)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(valley, is formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(lake, were formed in finland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(lake, were formed in finland)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(lake, were formed in finland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(lake tahoe, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(lake tahoe, was formed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(lake, were formed in finland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(lake, were formed in finland)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(lake, were formed in finland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(lake, was toupo in toupo formed)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(lake, were formed in finland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(lake, was toupo in toupo formed)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(lake, were formed in finland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(lake, was toupo in toupo formed)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(lake, were formed in finland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(lake, was toupo in toupo formed)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(lake, were formed in finland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(lake, were formed in scandinavian countries)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(lake, were formed in finland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(lake, were formed in finland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(lake, were formed in finland)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(lake, were formed in finland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(lake, were formed in finland)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(lake, were formed in finland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(valley, is formed)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(lake, were formed in finland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(reservoir, be formed)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(lake, were formed in finland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(valley, be formed)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(lake, were formed in finland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(wetland, be formed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(lake, were formed in finland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(lake tahoe, was formed)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(lake, were formed in finland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(valley, is formed)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(lake, were formed in finland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(reservoir, be formed)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(lake, were formed in finland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(valley, be formed)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(lake, were formed in finland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(wetland, be formed)