language: affect culture

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents programming language
Weight: 0.85
, english language
Weight: 0.85
, sign language
Weight: 0.81
, subject
Weight: 0.63
Siblings italian language
Weight: 0.79
, chinese language
Weight: 0.77
, american sign language
Weight: 0.76
, old english
Weight: 0.75
, haitian creole
Weight: 0.72

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect culture 1.00
be important to culture 0.92
be important in culture 0.92
be related to culture 0.92
be part of culture 0.91
relate to culture 0.91
be important part of culture 0.90
reflect culture 0.88
has state culture 0.87
be important element of culture 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(language, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(language, affect culture)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(language, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(language, be important to culture)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(language, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(language, be important in culture)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(language, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(language, be related to culture)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(language, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(language, be part of culture)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(language, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(language, be important element of culture)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(language, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(language, be related to culture)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(language, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(language, be related to culture)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(language, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(language, be part of culture)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(language, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(language, be important in culture)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(language, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(language, be related to culture)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(language, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(language, be important to culture)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(language, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(language, be important element of culture)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(language, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(language, be part of culture)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(language, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(language, be important in culture)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(language, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(language, be part of culture)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(language, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(language, be important element of culture)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(language, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(language, be important in culture)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(language, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(language, be important element of culture)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(language, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(language, be important to culture)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(language, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(language, be important to culture)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(language, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(language, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(language, affect culture)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(language, affect culture)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(language, affect culture)