language: be related to culture

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents programming language
Weight: 0.85
, english language
Weight: 0.85
, sign language
Weight: 0.81
, subject
Weight: 0.63
Siblings italian language
Weight: 0.79
, chinese language
Weight: 0.77
, american sign language
Weight: 0.76
, old english
Weight: 0.75
, haitian creole
Weight: 0.72

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to culture 1.00
be part of culture 0.92
be important in culture 0.92
affect culture 0.92
be important to culture 0.91
relate to culture 0.91
be important part of culture 0.90
has state culture 0.89
be connected to culture 0.88
be important element of culture 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(language, be related to culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(language, be related to culture)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(language, be related to culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(language, affect culture)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(language, be related to culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(language, be important to culture)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(language, be related to culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(language, be part of culture)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(language, be related to culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(language, be important in culture)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(language, be related to culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(language, affect culture)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(language, be related to culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(language, be important element of culture)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(language, be related to culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(language, affect culture)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(language, be related to culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(language, affect culture)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(language, be related to culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(language, be part of culture)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(language, be related to culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(language, be important in culture)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(language, be related to culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(language, be important to culture)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(language, be related to culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(language, be important element of culture)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(language, be related to culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(language, be part of culture)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(language, be related to culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(language, be part of culture)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(language, be related to culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(language, be important in culture)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(language, be related to culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(language, be important in culture)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(language, be related to culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(language, be important element of culture)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(language, be related to culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(language, be important element of culture)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(language, be related to culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(language, be important to culture)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(language, be related to culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(language, be important to culture)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(language, be related to culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(language, be related to culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(language, be related to culture)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(language, be related to culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(language, be related to culture)