language: be important to culture

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents programming language
Weight: 0.85
, english language
Weight: 0.85
, sign language
Weight: 0.81
, subject
Weight: 0.63
Siblings italian language
Weight: 0.79
, chinese language
Weight: 0.77
, american sign language
Weight: 0.76
, old english
Weight: 0.75
, haitian creole
Weight: 0.72

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to culture 1.00
be important in culture 1.00
be important part of culture 0.98
be part of culture 0.95
be important element of culture 0.93
affect culture 0.92
be related to culture 0.91
has state culture 0.91
be important aspect of culture 0.91
be most important element of culture 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(language, be important to culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(language, be important to culture)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(language, be important to culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(language, be important in culture)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(language, be important to culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(language, affect culture)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(language, be important to culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(language, be important in culture)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(language, be important to culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(language, be part of culture)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(language, be important to culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(language, be important in culture)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(language, be important to culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(language, affect culture)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(language, be important to culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(language, be part of culture)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(language, be important to culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(language, affect culture)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(language, be important to culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(language, be related to culture)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(language, be important to culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(language, be important element of culture)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(language, be important to culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(language, be related to culture)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(language, be important to culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(language, be part of culture)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(language, be important to culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(language, be important element of culture)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(language, be important to culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(language, be related to culture)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(language, be important to culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(language, be important in culture)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(language, be important to culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(language, be important element of culture)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(language, be important to culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(language, be part of culture)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(language, be important to culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(language, be important element of culture)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(language, be important to culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(language, be related to culture)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(language, be important to culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(language, affect culture)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(language, be important to culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(language, be important to culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(language, be important to culture)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(language, be important to culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(language, be important to culture)