language: were created

Related concepts

Parents	programming language Weight: 0.85 , english language Weight: 0.85 , sign language Weight: 0.81 , subject Weight: 0.63
Siblings	italian language Weight: 0.79 , chinese language Weight: 0.77 , american sign language Weight: 0.76 , old english Weight: 0.75 , haitian creole Weight: 0.72

Related properties

Property	Similarity
were created	1.00
was created	0.95
be created	0.94
is created	0.93
get created	0.91
was produced	0.79
was developed	0.78
be formed	0.77
be created from scratch	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.28

Plausible(sign language, was created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Typical(language, were created)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(programming language, be created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Typical(language, were created)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(programming language, is created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Typical(language, were created)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.19

Plausible(programming language, get created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Typical(language, were created)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(sign language, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Typical(language, were created)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.15

Plausible(programming language, be formed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Typical(language, were created)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(programming language, be created from scratch) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Typical(language, were created)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.48

Plausible(language, were created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Plausible(programming language, be created)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.48

Plausible(language, were created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Plausible(programming language, is created)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.48

Plausible(language, were created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Plausible(programming language, get created)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.48

Plausible(language, were created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Plausible(sign language, was created)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.48

Plausible(language, were created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Plausible(programming language, be formed)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.48

Plausible(language, were created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Plausible(programming language, be created from scratch)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.48

Plausible(language, were created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Plausible(sign language, was developed)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(language, were created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(programming language, be created from scratch)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(language, were created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(sign language, was developed)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(language, were created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(sign language, was created)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(language, were created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(programming language, be created)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(language, were created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(programming language, get created)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(language, were created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(programming language, is created)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(language, were created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(programming language, be formed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.28

Plausible(sign language, was created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(language, were created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Plausible(language, were created)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(programming language, be created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(language, were created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Plausible(language, were created)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(programming language, is created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(language, were created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Plausible(language, were created)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.19

Plausible(programming language, get created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(language, were created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Plausible(language, were created)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(sign language, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(language, were created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Plausible(language, were created)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.15

Plausible(programming language, be formed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(language, were created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Plausible(language, were created)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(programming language, be created from scratch) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(language, were created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Plausible(language, were created)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.48

Plausible(language, were created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Salient(language, were created)

Similarity expansion

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(language, were created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(language, was created)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.32

Typical(language, were created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(language, was created)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.70

Salient(language, were created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Salient(language, was created)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(language, were created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(language, was developed)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(language, were created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(language, was produced)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.48

Plausible(language, were created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Plausible(language, was created)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.32

Typical(language, were created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Typical(language, was produced)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.70

Salient(language, were created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Salient(language, was produced)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.48

Plausible(language, were created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Plausible(language, was produced)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.70

Salient(language, were created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Salient(language, was developed)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.48

Plausible(language, were created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Plausible(language, was developed)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.32

Typical(language, were created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Typical(language, was developed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.70

Salient(language, were created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Typical(language, were created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(language, were created)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.48

Plausible(language, were created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Typical(language, were created)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(language, were created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Typical(programming language, be created)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(language, were created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.00

¬ Typical(programming language, is created)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(language, were created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Typical(programming language, get created)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(language, were created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(sign language, was created)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(language, were created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.00

¬ Typical(programming language, be formed)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(language, were created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Typical(sign language, was developed)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(language, were created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(programming language, be created from scratch)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.32

Typical(language, were created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Typical(programming language, be created)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.32

Typical(language, were created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.00

¬ Typical(programming language, is created)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.32

Typical(language, were created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(sign language, was created)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.32

Typical(language, were created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Typical(programming language, get created)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.32

Typical(language, were created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.00

¬ Typical(programming language, be formed)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.32

Typical(language, were created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Typical(sign language, was developed)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.32

Typical(language, were created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(programming language, be created from scratch)