law firm: have horrible names

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents accounting firm
Weight: 0.75
, partner
Weight: 0.68
, business
Weight: 0.68
, firm
Weight: 0.61
Siblings company
Weight: 0.68
, lobbyist
Weight: 0.53
, software company
Weight: 0.36
, advertising agency
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
have horrible names 1.00
have names 0.85
have two names 0.83
have three names 0.82
use last names 0.82
use names 0.81
be named after last names 0.78
be named after names 0.78
have twice same name 0.76
have twice name 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(law firm, have horrible names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(law firm, have horrible names)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(law firm, have horrible names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(law firm, have names)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(law firm, have horrible names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(law firm, use names)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(law firm, have horrible names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(law firm, have two names)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(law firm, have horrible names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(law firm, use names)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(law firm, have horrible names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(law firm, use last names)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(law firm, have horrible names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(law firm, have names)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(law firm, have horrible names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(law firm, have three names)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(law firm, have horrible names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(law firm, have two names)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(law firm, have horrible names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(law firm, have names)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(law firm, have horrible names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(law firm, be named after names)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(law firm, have horrible names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(law firm, use names)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(law firm, have horrible names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(law firm, be named after last names)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(law firm, have horrible names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(law firm, use last names)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(law firm, have horrible names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(law firm, have twice name)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(law firm, have horrible names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(law firm, have twice same name)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(law firm, have horrible names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(law firm, have three names)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(law firm, have horrible names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(law firm, use last names)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(law firm, have horrible names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(law firm, have two names)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(law firm, have horrible names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(law firm, have twice name)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(law firm, have horrible names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(law firm, have twice name)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(law firm, have horrible names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(law firm, have three names)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(law firm, have horrible names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(law firm, have twice same name)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(law firm, have horrible names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(law firm, have twice same name)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(law firm, have horrible names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(law firm, be named after names)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(law firm, have horrible names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(law firm, be named after last names)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(law firm, have horrible names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(law firm, have twice name)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(law firm, have horrible names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(law firm, be named after last names)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(law firm, have horrible names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(law firm, have twice same name)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(law firm, have horrible names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(law firm, be named after names)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(law firm, have horrible names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(law firm, be named after last names)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(law firm, have horrible names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(law firm, have three names)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(law firm, have horrible names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(law firm, use last names)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(law firm, have horrible names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(law firm, be named after names)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(law firm, have horrible names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(law firm, have two names)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(law firm, have horrible names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(law firm, have names)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(law firm, have horrible names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(law firm, use names)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(law firm, have horrible names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(law firm, have horrible names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(law firm, have horrible names)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(law firm, have horrible names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(law firm, have horrible names)