law firm: have twice name

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents accounting firm
Weight: 0.75
, partner
Weight: 0.68
, business
Weight: 0.68
, firm
Weight: 0.61
Siblings company
Weight: 0.68
, lobbyist
Weight: 0.53
, software company
Weight: 0.36
, advertising agency
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
have twice name 1.00
have twice same name 0.97
use last names 0.83
have three names 0.83
have two names 0.82
have names 0.81
be named after last names 0.81
be named after names 0.78
use names 0.78
have horrible names 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(law firm, have twice name)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(law firm, have twice name)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(law firm, have twice name)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(law firm, have twice same name)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(law firm, have twice name)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(law firm, use names)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(law firm, have twice name)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(law firm, have twice same name)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(law firm, have twice name)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(law firm, have names)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(law firm, have twice name)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(law firm, have twice same name)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(law firm, have twice name)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(law firm, have two names)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(law firm, have twice name)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(law firm, use last names)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(law firm, have twice name)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(law firm, use names)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(law firm, have twice name)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(law firm, have twice same name)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(law firm, have twice name)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(law firm, have three names)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(law firm, have twice name)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(law firm, have names)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(law firm, have twice name)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(law firm, be named after last names)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(law firm, have twice name)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(law firm, be named after names)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(law firm, have twice name)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(law firm, use last names)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(law firm, have twice name)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(law firm, have two names)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(law firm, have twice name)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(law firm, have horrible names)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(law firm, have twice name)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(law firm, use names)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(law firm, have twice name)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(law firm, have three names)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(law firm, have twice name)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(law firm, be named after last names)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(law firm, have twice name)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(law firm, use last names)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(law firm, have twice name)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(law firm, have horrible names)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(law firm, have twice name)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(law firm, have horrible names)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(law firm, have twice name)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(law firm, have names)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(law firm, have twice name)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(law firm, be named after last names)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(law firm, have twice name)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(law firm, have two names)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(law firm, have twice name)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(law firm, have three names)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(law firm, have twice name)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(law firm, use last names)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(law firm, have twice name)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(law firm, be named after names)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(law firm, have twice name)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(law firm, have three names)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(law firm, have twice name)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(law firm, have horrible names)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(law firm, have twice name)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(law firm, be named after names)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(law firm, have twice name)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(law firm, be named after last names)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(law firm, have twice name)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(law firm, be named after names)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(law firm, have twice name)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(law firm, have two names)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(law firm, have twice name)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(law firm, have names)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(law firm, have twice name)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(law firm, use names)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(law firm, have twice name)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(law firm, have twice name)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(law firm, have twice name)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(law firm, have twice name)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(law firm, have twice name)