lawyer: present your case to court

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activist
Weight: 0.71
, expert
Weight: 0.69
, specialist
Weight: 0.66
, defendant
Weight: 0.66
Siblings investigator
Weight: 0.65
, solicitor
Weight: 0.58
, arbitrator
Weight: 0.54
, fisher
Weight: 0.54
, judge
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
present your case to court 1.00
rest his case in court 0.91
present case 0.91
be used to represent you in court 0.85
speak in court 0.85
go into court 0.84
state case 0.84
object in court room 0.84
prove their case 0.83
be used to decide case 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(activist, go into court) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(lawyer, present your case to court)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(lawyer, present your case to court) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(activist, go into court)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, present your case to court) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(activist, go into court)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, present your case to court) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(judge, speak in court)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, present your case to court) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(judge, be used to decide case)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(activist, go into court) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(lawyer, present your case to court) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(lawyer, present your case to court)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(lawyer, present your case to court) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(judge, be used to decide case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(judge, be used to decide case)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(lawyer, present your case to court) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(judge, speak in court) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(judge, speak in court)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(lawyer, present your case to court) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(lawyer, present your case to court)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(lawyer, present your case to court) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(lawyer, rest his case in court)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(lawyer, present your case to court) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(lawyer, present case)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(lawyer, present your case to court) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, present case)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(lawyer, present your case to court) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(lawyer, present case)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(lawyer, present your case to court) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, rest his case in court)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(lawyer, present your case to court) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(lawyer, present your case to court) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, present your case to court)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(lawyer, present your case to court) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(lawyer, present your case to court)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, present your case to court) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(activist, go into court)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, present your case to court) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(judge, be used to decide case)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, present your case to court) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(judge, speak in court)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(lawyer, present your case to court) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(activist, go into court)