lawyer: wear black

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activist
Weight: 0.71
, expert
Weight: 0.69
, specialist
Weight: 0.66
, defendant
Weight: 0.66
Siblings investigator
Weight: 0.65
, barrister
Weight: 0.59
, solicitor
Weight: 0.58
, marshall
Weight: 0.56
, john marshall
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear black 1.00
wear black white 0.98
wear white 0.97
wear black uniform 0.92
wear black clothes 0.92
wear black coats 0.91
wear black coat 0.90
have wear 0.90
wear white shirts 0.90
wear white shirt 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(defendant, wear white shirts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(lawyer, wear black)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(defendant, wear white shirt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(lawyer, wear black)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(lawyer, wear black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(defendant, wear white shirts)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(lawyer, wear black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(defendant, wear white shirt)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, wear black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(defendant, wear white shirts)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, wear black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(defendant, wear white shirt)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, wear black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(solicitor, wear black)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, wear black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(barrister, have wear)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(defendant, wear white shirts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(lawyer, wear black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(lawyer, wear black)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(defendant, wear white shirt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(lawyer, wear black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(lawyer, wear black)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(lawyer, wear black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(solicitor, wear black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(solicitor, wear black)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(lawyer, wear black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(barrister, have wear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(barrister, have wear)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(lawyer, wear black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(lawyer, wear black)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(lawyer, wear black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(lawyer, wear black clothes)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(lawyer, wear black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(lawyer, wear black clothes)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(lawyer, wear black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(lawyer, wear black clothes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(lawyer, wear black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, wear black clothes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(lawyer, wear black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(lawyer, wear black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, wear black)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(lawyer, wear black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(lawyer, wear black)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, wear black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(defendant, wear white shirts)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, wear black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(defendant, wear white shirt)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, wear black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(barrister, have wear)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, wear black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(solicitor, wear black)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(lawyer, wear black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(defendant, wear white shirts)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(lawyer, wear black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(defendant, wear white shirt)