defendant: wear white shirts

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.66
, child
Weight: 0.62
, act
Weight: 0.60
, official
Weight: 0.60
, operator
Weight: 0.59
Siblings prosecutor
Weight: 0.60
, juror
Weight: 0.36
, victim
Weight: 0.35
, one person
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear white shirts 1.00
wear shirts 0.98
wear white shirt 0.95
wear shirt 0.92
wear suits 0.85
wear glasses 0.80
wear headphones in court 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(defendant, wear white shirts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(defendant, wear white shirts)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(defendant, wear white shirts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(defendant, wear shirts)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(defendant, wear white shirts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(defendant, wear shirts)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(defendant, wear white shirts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(defendant, wear white shirt)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(defendant, wear white shirts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(defendant, wear shirts)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(defendant, wear white shirts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(defendant, wear shirt)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(defendant, wear white shirts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(defendant, wear white shirt)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(defendant, wear white shirts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(defendant, wear shirt)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(defendant, wear white shirts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(defendant, wear shirt)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(defendant, wear white shirts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(defendant, wear white shirt)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(defendant, wear white shirts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(defendant, wear suits)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(defendant, wear white shirts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(defendant, wear suits)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(defendant, wear white shirts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(defendant, wear suits)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(defendant, wear white shirts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(defendant, wear glasses)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(defendant, wear white shirts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(defendant, wear glasses)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(defendant, wear white shirts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(defendant, wear glasses)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(defendant, wear white shirts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(defendant, wear headphones in court)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(defendant, wear white shirts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(defendant, wear headphones in court)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(defendant, wear white shirts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(defendant, wear white shirt)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(defendant, wear white shirts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(defendant, wear headphones in court)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(defendant, wear white shirts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(defendant, wear shirts)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(defendant, wear white shirts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(defendant, wear glasses)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(defendant, wear white shirts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(defendant, wear suits)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(defendant, wear white shirts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(defendant, wear shirt)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(defendant, wear white shirts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(defendant, wear headphones in court)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(defendant, wear white shirts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(defendant, wear white shirts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(defendant, wear white shirts)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(defendant, wear white shirts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(defendant, wear white shirts)