defendant: wear white shirt

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.66
, child
Weight: 0.62
, act
Weight: 0.60
, official
Weight: 0.60
, operator
Weight: 0.59
Siblings prosecutor
Weight: 0.60
, juror
Weight: 0.36
, victim
Weight: 0.35
, one person
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear white shirt 1.00
wear shirt 0.98
wear white shirts 0.95
wear shirts 0.93
wear suits 0.81
wear glasses 0.79
wear headphones in court 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(defendant, wear white shirt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(defendant, wear white shirt)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(defendant, wear white shirt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(defendant, wear shirt)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(defendant, wear white shirt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(defendant, wear shirt)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(defendant, wear white shirt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(defendant, wear shirt)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(defendant, wear white shirt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(defendant, wear white shirts)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(defendant, wear white shirt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(defendant, wear shirts)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(defendant, wear white shirt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(defendant, wear white shirts)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(defendant, wear white shirt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(defendant, wear shirts)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(defendant, wear white shirt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(defendant, wear shirts)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(defendant, wear white shirt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(defendant, wear white shirts)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(defendant, wear white shirt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(defendant, wear suits)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(defendant, wear white shirt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(defendant, wear suits)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(defendant, wear white shirt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(defendant, wear glasses)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(defendant, wear white shirt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(defendant, wear suits)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(defendant, wear white shirt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(defendant, wear glasses)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(defendant, wear white shirt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(defendant, wear glasses)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(defendant, wear white shirt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(defendant, wear headphones in court)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(defendant, wear white shirt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(defendant, wear headphones in court)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(defendant, wear white shirt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(defendant, wear white shirts)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(defendant, wear white shirt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(defendant, wear headphones in court)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(defendant, wear white shirt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(defendant, wear shirt)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(defendant, wear white shirt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(defendant, wear shirts)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(defendant, wear white shirt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(defendant, wear glasses)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(defendant, wear white shirt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(defendant, wear headphones in court)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(defendant, wear white shirt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(defendant, wear suits)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(defendant, wear white shirt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(defendant, wear white shirt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(defendant, wear white shirt)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(defendant, wear white shirt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(defendant, wear white shirt)