defendant: wear suits

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.66
, child
Weight: 0.62
, act
Weight: 0.60
, official
Weight: 0.60
, operator
Weight: 0.59
Siblings prosecutor
Weight: 0.60
, juror
Weight: 0.36
, victim
Weight: 0.35
, one person
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear suits 1.00
wear white shirts 0.85
wear shirts 0.84
wear white shirt 0.81
wear shirt 0.80
wear headphones in court 0.78
wear glasses 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(defendant, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(defendant, wear suits)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(defendant, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(defendant, wear white shirts)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(defendant, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(defendant, wear shirts)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(defendant, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(defendant, wear white shirt)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(defendant, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(defendant, wear shirts)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(defendant, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(defendant, wear headphones in court)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(defendant, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(defendant, wear shirts)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(defendant, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(defendant, wear shirt)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(defendant, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(defendant, wear shirts)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(defendant, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(defendant, wear glasses)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(defendant, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(defendant, wear shirt)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(defendant, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(defendant, wear shirt)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(defendant, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(defendant, wear glasses)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(defendant, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(defendant, wear headphones in court)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(defendant, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(defendant, wear white shirts)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(defendant, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(defendant, wear shirt)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(defendant, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(defendant, wear glasses)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(defendant, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(defendant, wear glasses)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(defendant, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(defendant, wear white shirt)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(defendant, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(defendant, wear white shirts)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(defendant, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(defendant, wear headphones in court)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(defendant, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(defendant, wear headphones in court)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(defendant, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(defendant, wear white shirts)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(defendant, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(defendant, wear white shirt)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(defendant, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(defendant, wear white shirt)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(defendant, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(defendant, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(defendant, wear suits)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(defendant, wear suits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(defendant, wear suits)