leader: be selected in canada

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents religious leader
Weight: 0.77
, position
Weight: 0.63
, manager
Weight: 0.61
, candidate
Weight: 0.60
Siblings prime minister
Weight: 0.70
, leadership
Weight: 0.70
, politician
Weight: 0.69
, mentor
Weight: 0.67
, king
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
be selected in canada 1.00
be chosen in canada 0.97
be selected in india 0.90
be in ireland selected 0.88
be selected in france 0.85
be selected in britain 0.85
be chosen in mexico 0.84
be in england selected 0.84
be chosen in zealand 0.83
be chosen in colombia 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(leader, be selected in canada)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(prime minister, be selected in canada)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(leader, be selected in canada)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(prime minister, be selected in canada)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(prime minister, be selected in canada)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(leader, be selected in canada)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(leader, be selected in canada)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(leader, be selected in canada)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(leader, be chosen in canada)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(leader, be selected in canada)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(leader, be selected in india)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(leader, be selected in canada)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(leader, be chosen in canada)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(leader, be selected in canada)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(leader, be in ireland selected)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(leader, be selected in canada)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(leader, be chosen in canada)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(leader, be selected in canada)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(leader, be selected in france)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(leader, be selected in canada)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(leader, be in england selected)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(leader, be selected in canada)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(leader, be chosen in mexico)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(leader, be selected in canada)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(leader, be chosen in colombia)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(leader, be selected in canada)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(leader, be in ireland selected)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(leader, be selected in canada)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(leader, be in ireland selected)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(leader, be selected in canada)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(leader, be selected in india)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(leader, be selected in canada)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(leader, be in england selected)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(leader, be selected in canada)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(leader, be selected in india)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(leader, be selected in canada)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(leader, be in england selected)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(leader, be selected in canada)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(leader, be chosen in canada)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(leader, be selected in canada)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(leader, be selected in france)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(leader, be selected in canada)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(leader, be chosen in mexico)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(leader, be selected in canada)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(leader, be selected in france)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(leader, be selected in canada)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(leader, be chosen in mexico)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(leader, be selected in canada)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(leader, be chosen in colombia)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(leader, be selected in canada)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(leader, be chosen in colombia)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(leader, be selected in canada)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(leader, be in ireland selected)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(leader, be selected in canada)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(leader, be selected in india)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(leader, be selected in canada)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(leader, be in england selected)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(leader, be selected in canada)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(leader, be chosen in mexico)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(leader, be selected in canada)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(leader, be selected in france)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(leader, be selected in canada)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(leader, be chosen in colombia)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(leader, be selected in canada)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(leader, be selected in canada)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(leader, be selected in canada)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(leader, be selected in canada)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(leader, be selected in canada)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(leader, be selected in canada)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(prime minister, be selected in canada)