leadership: be valued

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents leader
Weight: 0.70
, role
Weight: 0.67
, ability
Weight: 0.63
, attribute
Weight: 0.63
Siblings pastoral
Weight: 0.46
, religious leader
Weight: 0.36
, mentor
Weight: 0.34
, chairman
Weight: 0.33
, speaker
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be valued 1.00
be valued by employers 0.83
is important value 0.77
is value 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(attribute, be valued by employers)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(leadership, be valued)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(leadership, be valued)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(attribute, be valued by employers)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(leadership, be valued)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(attribute, be valued by employers)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(attribute, be valued by employers)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(leadership, be valued)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(leadership, be valued)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(leadership, be valued)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(leadership, be valued)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(leadership, be valued)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(leadership, be valued by employers)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(leadership, be valued)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(leadership, is value)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(leadership, be valued)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(leadership, is important value)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(leadership, be valued)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(leadership, is value)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(leadership, be valued)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(leadership, is value)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(leadership, be valued)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(leadership, be valued by employers)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(leadership, be valued)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(leadership, is value)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(leadership, be valued)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(leadership, is important value)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(leadership, be valued)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(leadership, is important value)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(leadership, be valued)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(leadership, is important value)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(leadership, be valued)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(leadership, be valued by employers)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(leadership, be valued)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(leadership, be valued by employers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(leadership, be valued)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(leadership, be valued)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(leadership, be valued)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(leadership, be valued)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(leadership, be valued)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(leadership, be valued)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(attribute, be valued by employers)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(leadership, be valued)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(attribute, be valued by employers)