legislator: be selected

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents leader
Weight: 0.60
, woman
Weight: 0.58
, candidate
Weight: 0.58
, representative
Weight: 0.57
Siblings politician
Weight: 0.37
, congressman
Weight: 0.35
, speaker
Weight: 0.34
, democrat
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be selected 1.00
were selected 0.97
were chosen serve 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(representative, were chosen serve) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(legislator, be selected)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(leader, be selected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(legislator, be selected)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(representative, be selected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(legislator, be selected)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(legislator, be selected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(representative, be selected)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(legislator, be selected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(leader, be selected)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(legislator, be selected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(representative, were chosen serve)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(legislator, be selected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(representative, were chosen serve)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(legislator, be selected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(leader, be selected)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(legislator, be selected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(representative, be selected)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(legislator, be selected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(speaker, be selected)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(leader, be selected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(legislator, be selected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(legislator, be selected)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(representative, be selected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(legislator, be selected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(legislator, be selected)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(representative, were chosen serve) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(legislator, be selected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(legislator, be selected)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(legislator, be selected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(speaker, be selected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(speaker, be selected)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(legislator, be selected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(legislator, be selected)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(legislator, be selected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(legislator, were selected)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(legislator, be selected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(legislator, were selected)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(legislator, be selected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(legislator, were selected)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(legislator, be selected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(legislator, were selected)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(legislator, be selected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(legislator, were chosen serve)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(legislator, be selected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(legislator, were chosen serve)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(legislator, be selected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(legislator, were chosen serve)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(legislator, be selected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(legislator, were chosen serve)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(legislator, be selected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(legislator, be selected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(legislator, be selected)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(legislator, be selected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(legislator, be selected)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(legislator, be selected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(representative, be selected)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(legislator, be selected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(leader, be selected)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(legislator, be selected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(representative, were chosen serve)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(legislator, be selected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(speaker, be selected)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(legislator, be selected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(representative, be selected)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(legislator, be selected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(leader, be selected)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(legislator, be selected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(representative, were chosen serve)