representative: were chosen serve

Related concepts

Parents	agent Weight: 0.67 , officer Weight: 0.67 , employee Weight: 0.66 , partner Weight: 0.65 , member Weight: 0.62
Siblings	manager Weight: 0.68 , observer Weight: 0.59 , chairperson Weight: 0.52 , family member Weight: 0.37 , vice president Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property	Similarity
were chosen serve	1.00
were chosen serve in congress	0.89
serve for two years	0.85
be from state chosen	0.84
be selected	0.83
be chosen form	0.83
serve 2 years	0.82
were in house chosen	0.82
be selected for house	0.81
were in house originally chosen	0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(member, be selected) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(representative, were chosen serve)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(representative, were chosen serve) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(member, be selected)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(representative, were chosen serve) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(member, be selected)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(representative, were chosen serve) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(vice president, be selected)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(representative, were chosen serve) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(vice president, be selected)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(member, be selected) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

Remarkable(representative, were chosen serve) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(representative, were chosen serve)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(representative, were chosen serve) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(vice president, be selected) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(vice president, be selected)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(representative, were chosen serve) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(vice president, be selected) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(vice president, be selected)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(representative, were chosen serve) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Salient(representative, were chosen serve)

Similarity expansion

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.80

Typical(representative, were chosen serve) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Typical(representative, be selected)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.75

Salient(representative, were chosen serve) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Salient(representative, be selected for house)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.75

Salient(representative, were chosen serve) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Salient(representative, were in house chosen)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(representative, were chosen serve) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Plausible(representative, be selected)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.75

Salient(representative, were chosen serve) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Salient(representative, be chosen form)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.80

Typical(representative, were chosen serve) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(representative, be chosen form)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.50

Remarkable(representative, were chosen serve) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Remarkable(representative, be selected for house)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(representative, were chosen serve) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Plausible(representative, were in house chosen)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.80

Typical(representative, were chosen serve) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(representative, were chosen serve in congress)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.75

Salient(representative, were chosen serve) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Salient(representative, be selected)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(representative, were chosen serve) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Plausible(representative, be selected for house)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(representative, were chosen serve) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Plausible(representative, be chosen form)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.80

Typical(representative, were chosen serve) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(representative, were in house chosen)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.80

Typical(representative, were chosen serve) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(representative, be from state chosen)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.75

Salient(representative, were chosen serve) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Salient(representative, were chosen serve in congress)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.80

Typical(representative, were chosen serve) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(representative, be selected for house)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.50

Remarkable(representative, were chosen serve) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(representative, were in house chosen)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.75

Salient(representative, were chosen serve) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Salient(representative, were in house originally chosen)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(representative, were chosen serve) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(representative, were chosen serve in congress)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.80

Typical(representative, were chosen serve) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(representative, serve for two years)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.80

Typical(representative, were chosen serve) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(representative, serve 2 years)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(representative, were chosen serve) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Plausible(representative, be from state chosen)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.50

Remarkable(representative, were chosen serve) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Remarkable(representative, were in house originally chosen)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.75

Salient(representative, were chosen serve) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Salient(representative, be from state chosen)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.75

Salient(representative, were chosen serve) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Salient(representative, serve for two years)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.50

Remarkable(representative, were chosen serve) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(representative, were chosen serve in congress)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(representative, were chosen serve) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(representative, serve for two years)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(representative, were chosen serve) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Plausible(representative, were in house originally chosen)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.75

Salient(representative, were chosen serve) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Salient(representative, serve 2 years)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.80

Typical(representative, were chosen serve) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(representative, were in house originally chosen)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.50

Remarkable(representative, were chosen serve) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(representative, be chosen form)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.50

Remarkable(representative, were chosen serve) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Remarkable(representative, serve 2 years)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.50

Remarkable(representative, were chosen serve) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(representative, serve for two years)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(representative, were chosen serve) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Plausible(representative, serve 2 years)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.50

Remarkable(representative, were chosen serve) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(representative, be from state chosen)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.50

Remarkable(representative, were chosen serve) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(representative, be selected)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.75

Salient(representative, were chosen serve) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(representative, were chosen serve) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(representative, were chosen serve)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(representative, were chosen serve) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(representative, were chosen serve)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(representative, were chosen serve) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(member, be selected)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(representative, were chosen serve) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(vice president, be selected)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(representative, were chosen serve) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(vice president, be selected)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.80

Typical(representative, were chosen serve) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(member, be selected)