representative: be from state chosen

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents agent
Weight: 0.67
, officer
Weight: 0.67
, employee
Weight: 0.66
, partner
Weight: 0.65
, member
Weight: 0.62
Siblings manager
Weight: 0.68
, observer
Weight: 0.59
, chairperson
Weight: 0.52
, family member
Weight: 0.37
, vice president
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be from state chosen 1.00
be chosen form 0.88
be selected 0.86
were chosen serve 0.84
be selected for house 0.84
were in house chosen 0.84
be selected for house of representatives 0.81
were chosen serve in congress 0.80
were to convention chosen 0.79
were in house originally chosen 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(member, be selected)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(representative, be from state chosen)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(representative, be from state chosen)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(member, be selected)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(representative, be from state chosen)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(member, be selected)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(representative, be from state chosen)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(vice president, be selected)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(representative, be from state chosen)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(vice president, be selected)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(member, be selected)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(representative, be from state chosen)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(representative, be from state chosen)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(representative, be from state chosen)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(vice president, be selected)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(vice president, be selected)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(representative, be from state chosen)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(vice president, be selected)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(vice president, be selected)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(representative, be from state chosen)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(representative, be from state chosen)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(representative, be from state chosen)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(representative, be chosen form)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(representative, be from state chosen)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(representative, be selected for house)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(representative, be from state chosen)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(representative, be selected for house)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(representative, be from state chosen)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(representative, were in house chosen)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(representative, be from state chosen)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(representative, be selected)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(representative, be from state chosen)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(representative, were in house chosen)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(representative, be from state chosen)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(representative, be chosen form)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(representative, be from state chosen)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(representative, be selected)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(representative, be from state chosen)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(representative, be chosen form)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(representative, be from state chosen)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(representative, be selected)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(representative, be from state chosen)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(representative, were in house chosen)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(representative, be from state chosen)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(representative, be selected for house)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(representative, be from state chosen)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(representative, be chosen form)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(representative, be from state chosen)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(representative, were in house originally chosen)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(representative, be from state chosen)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(representative, were chosen serve)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(representative, be from state chosen)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(representative, were in house originally chosen)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(representative, be from state chosen)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(representative, were chosen serve)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(representative, be from state chosen)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(representative, be selected for house of representatives)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(representative, be from state chosen)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(representative, were in house chosen)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(representative, be from state chosen)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(representative, were chosen serve in congress)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(representative, be from state chosen)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(representative, be selected for house)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(representative, be from state chosen)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(representative, be selected)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(representative, be from state chosen)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(representative, be selected for house of representatives)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(representative, be from state chosen)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(representative, were chosen serve in congress)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(representative, be from state chosen)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(representative, were in house originally chosen)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(representative, be from state chosen)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(representative, were chosen serve)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(representative, be from state chosen)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(representative, were to convention chosen)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(representative, be from state chosen)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(representative, were to convention chosen)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(representative, be from state chosen)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(representative, were chosen serve)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(representative, be from state chosen)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(representative, were to convention chosen)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(representative, be from state chosen)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(representative, were chosen serve in congress)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(representative, be from state chosen)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(representative, be selected for house of representatives)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(representative, be from state chosen)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(representative, were to convention chosen)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(representative, be from state chosen)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(representative, were in house originally chosen)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(representative, be from state chosen)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(representative, were chosen serve in congress)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(representative, be from state chosen)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(representative, be selected for house of representatives)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(representative, be from state chosen)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(representative, be from state chosen)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(representative, be from state chosen)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(representative, be from state chosen)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(representative, be from state chosen)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(representative, be from state chosen)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(member, be selected)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(representative, be from state chosen)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(vice president, be selected)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(representative, be from state chosen)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(vice president, be selected)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(representative, be from state chosen)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(member, be selected)