legislator: were selected

Related concepts

Parents	leader Weight: 0.60 , woman Weight: 0.58 , candidate Weight: 0.58 , representative Weight: 0.57
Siblings	politician Weight: 0.37 , congressman Weight: 0.35 , speaker Weight: 0.34 , democrat Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
were selected	1.00
be selected	0.97
were chosen serve	0.86
were chosen serve in assemblies	0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(representative, were chosen serve) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(legislator, were selected)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(leader, be selected) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(legislator, were selected)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.38

Plausible(representative, be selected) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(legislator, were selected)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(legislator, were selected) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Plausible(representative, be selected)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(legislator, were selected) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Plausible(leader, be selected)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(legislator, were selected) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(representative, were chosen serve)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(legislator, were selected) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(representative, were chosen serve)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(legislator, were selected) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(leader, be selected)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(legislator, were selected) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(representative, be selected)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(legislator, were selected) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(speaker, be selected)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(leader, be selected) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(legislator, were selected) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Plausible(legislator, were selected)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.38

Plausible(representative, be selected) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(legislator, were selected) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Plausible(legislator, were selected)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.74

Plausible(representative, were chosen serve) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(legislator, were selected) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Plausible(legislator, were selected)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(legislator, were selected) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(speaker, be selected) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(speaker, be selected)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(legislator, were selected) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Salient(legislator, were selected)

Similarity expansion

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.82

Salient(legislator, were selected) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Salient(legislator, be selected)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(legislator, were selected) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(legislator, be selected)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.69

Typical(legislator, were selected) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Typical(legislator, be selected)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(legislator, were selected) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(legislator, be selected)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.69

Typical(legislator, were selected) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Typical(legislator, were chosen serve)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.82

Salient(legislator, were selected) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Salient(legislator, were chosen serve)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(legislator, were selected) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Plausible(legislator, were chosen serve)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.69

Typical(legislator, were selected) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Typical(legislator, were chosen serve in assemblies)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.82

Salient(legislator, were selected) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Salient(legislator, were chosen serve in assemblies)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(legislator, were selected) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Plausible(legislator, were chosen serve in assemblies)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(legislator, were selected) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(legislator, were chosen serve)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(legislator, were selected) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(legislator, were chosen serve in assemblies)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.82

Salient(legislator, were selected) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(legislator, were selected) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(legislator, were selected)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(legislator, were selected) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(legislator, were selected)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(legislator, were selected) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Typical(representative, be selected)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(legislator, were selected) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(leader, be selected)

0.19

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(legislator, were selected) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(representative, were chosen serve)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(legislator, were selected) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(speaker, be selected)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.69

Typical(legislator, were selected) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Typical(representative, be selected)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.69

Typical(legislator, were selected) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(leader, be selected)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.69

Typical(legislator, were selected) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(representative, were chosen serve)