lens: be better than zoom

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents optics
Weight: 0.60
, piece
Weight: 0.60
, feature
Weight: 0.59
, polymer
Weight: 0.59
Siblings contact lens
Weight: 0.84
, camera lens
Weight: 0.70
, mirror
Weight: 0.65
, human eye
Weight: 0.62
, prism
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than zoom 1.00
be better than zoom lenses 0.91
be length related to zoom 0.85
be focal length related to zoom 0.81
make better sharper pictures 0.80
make sharper pictures 0.78
be better than lenses 0.78
be better than naruto 0.77
be magnification 0.77
make better pictures 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(piece, be better than naruto) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(lens, be better than zoom)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(lens, be better than zoom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(piece, be better than naruto)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(lens, be better than zoom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(piece, be better than naruto)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(lens, be better than zoom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(camera lens, be length related to zoom)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(lens, be better than zoom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(camera lens, be focal length related to zoom)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(lens, be better than zoom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(mirror, be better than lenses)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(lens, be better than zoom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(contact lens, be magnification)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(piece, be better than naruto) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(lens, be better than zoom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(lens, be better than zoom)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(lens, be better than zoom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(contact lens, be magnification) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(contact lens, be magnification)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(lens, be better than zoom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(camera lens, be length related to zoom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(camera lens, be length related to zoom)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(lens, be better than zoom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(mirror, be better than lenses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(mirror, be better than lenses)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(lens, be better than zoom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(camera lens, be focal length related to zoom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(camera lens, be focal length related to zoom)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(lens, be better than zoom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(lens, be better than zoom)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(lens, be better than zoom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(lens, be better than zoom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(lens, be better than zoom)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(lens, be better than zoom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(lens, be better than zoom)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(lens, be better than zoom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(piece, be better than naruto)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(lens, be better than zoom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(contact lens, be magnification)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(lens, be better than zoom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(mirror, be better than lenses)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(lens, be better than zoom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(camera lens, be length related to zoom)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(lens, be better than zoom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(camera lens, be focal length related to zoom)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(lens, be better than zoom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(piece, be better than naruto)