camera lens: be length related to zoom

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents lens
Weight: 0.70
, camera
Weight: 0.70
, electronic device
Weight: 0.66
, optics
Weight: 0.65
Siblings contact lens
Weight: 0.41
, digital camera
Weight: 0.39
, fiber optics
Weight: 0.36
, mirror
Weight: 0.35
, projector
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be length related to zoom 1.00
be focal length related to zoom 0.92
have 20x zoom 0.88
is zoom 0.88
zoom 0.88
be length related 0.87
be better than zoom 0.85
be length 0.85
have length 0.85
zoom in on ball 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(lens, be better than zoom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(camera lens, be length related to zoom)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(camera, zoom in on ball) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(camera lens, be length related to zoom)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(camera lens, be length related to zoom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(lens, be better than zoom)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(camera lens, be length related to zoom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(camera, zoom in on ball)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(camera lens, be length related to zoom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(camera, zoom in on ball)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(camera lens, be length related to zoom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(lens, be better than zoom)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(camera lens, be length related to zoom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(projector, is zoom)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(camera lens, be length related to zoom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(projector, zoom)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(camera lens, be length related to zoom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, is zoom)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(lens, be better than zoom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(camera lens, be length related to zoom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(camera lens, be length related to zoom)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(camera, zoom in on ball) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(camera lens, be length related to zoom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(camera lens, be length related to zoom)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(camera lens, be length related to zoom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(digital camera, is zoom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(digital camera, is zoom)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(camera lens, be length related to zoom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(projector, is zoom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(projector, is zoom)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(camera lens, be length related to zoom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(projector, zoom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(projector, zoom)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(camera lens, be length related to zoom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(camera lens, be length related to zoom)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(camera lens, be length related to zoom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(camera lens, be focal length related to zoom)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(camera lens, be length related to zoom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(camera lens, be focal length related to zoom)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(camera lens, be length related to zoom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(camera lens, be length related)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(camera lens, be length related to zoom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(camera lens, be length)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(camera lens, be length related to zoom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(camera lens, be focal length related to zoom)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(camera lens, be length related to zoom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(camera lens, be length related to zoom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(camera lens, be length related to zoom)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(camera lens, be length related to zoom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(camera lens, be length related to zoom)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(camera lens, be length related to zoom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(camera, zoom in on ball)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(camera lens, be length related to zoom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(lens, be better than zoom)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(camera lens, be length related to zoom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(projector, zoom)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(camera lens, be length related to zoom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(digital camera, is zoom)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(camera lens, be length related to zoom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(projector, is zoom)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(camera lens, be length related to zoom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(lens, be better than zoom)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(camera lens, be length related to zoom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(camera, zoom in on ball)