camera lens: be length related

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents lens
Weight: 0.70
, camera
Weight: 0.70
, electronic device
Weight: 0.66
, optics
Weight: 0.65
Siblings contact lens
Weight: 0.41
, digital camera
Weight: 0.39
, fiber optics
Weight: 0.36
, mirror
Weight: 0.35
, projector
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be length related 1.00
be length 0.95
have length 0.95
have short length 0.90
be length related to zoom 0.87
be focal length related 0.85
have short focal length 0.82
have focal length 0.81
be focal length 0.80
be focal length related to zoom 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(lens, have short focal length)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(camera lens, be length related)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(camera lens, be length related)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(lens, have short focal length)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(camera lens, be length related)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(lens, have short focal length)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(lens, have short focal length)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(camera lens, be length related)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(camera lens, be length related)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(camera lens, be length related)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(camera lens, be length related)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(camera lens, be length related)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(camera lens, be length)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(camera lens, be length related)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(camera lens, be length)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(camera lens, be length related)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(camera lens, be length)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(camera lens, be length related)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(camera lens, be length related to zoom)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(camera lens, be length related)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(camera lens, be length related to zoom)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(camera lens, be length related)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(camera lens, be focal length related)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(camera lens, be length related)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(camera lens, be length)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(camera lens, be length related)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(camera lens, be length related to zoom)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(camera lens, be length related)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(camera lens, be focal length related)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(camera lens, be length related)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(camera lens, be focal length)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(camera lens, be length related)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(camera lens, be focal length)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(camera lens, be length related)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(camera lens, be focal length related)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(camera lens, be length related)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(camera lens, be focal length related to zoom)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(camera lens, be length related)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(camera lens, be focal length related to zoom)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(camera lens, be length related)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(camera lens, be focal length related to zoom)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(camera lens, be length related)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(camera lens, be focal length)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(camera lens, be length related)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(camera lens, be focal length)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(camera lens, be length related)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(camera lens, be focal length related)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(camera lens, be length related)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(camera lens, be length related to zoom)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(camera lens, be length related)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(camera lens, be focal length related to zoom)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(camera lens, be length related)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(camera lens, be length related)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(camera lens, be length related)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(camera lens, be length related)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(camera lens, be length related)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(camera lens, be length related)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(lens, have short focal length)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(camera lens, be length related)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(lens, have short focal length)