lens: have short focal length

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents optics
Weight: 0.60
, piece
Weight: 0.60
, feature
Weight: 0.59
, polymer
Weight: 0.59
Siblings contact lens
Weight: 0.84
, camera lens
Weight: 0.70
, mirror
Weight: 0.65
, human eye
Weight: 0.62
, prism
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
have short focal length 1.00
have focal length 0.98
be focal length 0.97
be focal length related 0.96
be focal length related to zoom 0.92
have two focal points 0.86
have short length 0.86
have length 0.83
be length 0.83
be length related 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(lens, have short focal length)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(camera lens, be focal length)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(lens, have short focal length)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(camera lens, be focal length related)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(lens, have short focal length)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(camera lens, be focal length related to zoom)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(lens, have short focal length)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(camera lens, be length)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(lens, have short focal length)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(camera lens, be length related)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(lens, have short focal length)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(camera lens, be focal length related to zoom)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(camera lens, be focal length related to zoom)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(lens, have short focal length)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(camera lens, be focal length related)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(camera lens, be focal length related)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(lens, have short focal length)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(camera lens, be length)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(camera lens, be length)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(lens, have short focal length)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(camera lens, be focal length)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(camera lens, be focal length)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(lens, have short focal length)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(camera lens, be length related)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(camera lens, be length related)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(lens, have short focal length)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(lens, have short focal length)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(lens, have short focal length)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(lens, have two focal points)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(lens, have short focal length)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(lens, have two focal points)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(lens, have short focal length)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(lens, have two focal points)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(lens, have short focal length)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(lens, have two focal points)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(lens, have short focal length)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(lens, have short focal length)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(lens, have short focal length)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(lens, have short focal length)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(lens, have short focal length)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(lens, have short focal length)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(camera lens, be focal length)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(lens, have short focal length)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(camera lens, be focal length related)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(lens, have short focal length)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(camera lens, be length)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(lens, have short focal length)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(camera lens, be focal length related to zoom)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(lens, have short focal length)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(camera lens, be length related)