lens: have two focal points

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents optics
Weight: 0.60
, piece
Weight: 0.60
, feature
Weight: 0.59
, polymer
Weight: 0.59
Siblings contact lens
Weight: 0.84
, camera lens
Weight: 0.70
, mirror
Weight: 0.65
, human eye
Weight: 0.62
, prism
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
have two focal points 1.00
have focal length 0.89
be focal length 0.88
be focal length related 0.87
have short focal length 0.86
have two points 0.85
be focal length related to zoom 0.84
is points 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.17
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(feature, is points)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(lens, have two focal points)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(lens, have two focal points)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(feature, is points)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(lens, have two focal points)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(feature, is points)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(lens, have two focal points)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(camera lens, be focal length)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(lens, have two focal points)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(camera lens, be focal length related)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(lens, have two focal points)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(camera lens, be focal length related to zoom)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.21
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(feature, is points)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(lens, have two focal points)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(lens, have two focal points)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(lens, have two focal points)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(camera lens, be focal length related to zoom)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(camera lens, be focal length related to zoom)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(lens, have two focal points)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(camera lens, be focal length related)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(camera lens, be focal length related)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(lens, have two focal points)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(camera lens, be focal length)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(camera lens, be focal length)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(lens, have two focal points)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(lens, have two focal points)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(lens, have two focal points)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(lens, have short focal length)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(lens, have two focal points)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(lens, have two points)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(lens, have two focal points)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(lens, have two points)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(lens, have two focal points)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(lens, have two points)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(lens, have two focal points)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(lens, have short focal length)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(lens, have two focal points)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(lens, have short focal length)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(lens, have two focal points)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(lens, have two points)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(lens, have two focal points)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(lens, have short focal length)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(lens, have two focal points)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(lens, have two focal points)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(lens, have two focal points)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(lens, have two focal points)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(lens, have two focal points)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(lens, have two focal points)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(feature, is points)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(lens, have two focal points)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(camera lens, be focal length)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(lens, have two focal points)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(camera lens, be focal length related)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(lens, have two focal points)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(camera lens, be focal length related to zoom)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(lens, have two focal points)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(feature, is points)