lilacs: zone

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents shrub
Weight: 0.46
Siblings rhododendron
Weight: 0.33
, hydrangea
Weight: 0.32
, chestnut tree
Weight: 0.32
, fruit tree
Weight: 0.31
, maple tree
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
zone 1.00
has physical part zone 0.91
has physical part zones 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(lilacs, zone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(hydrangea, zone)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(lilacs, zone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(rhododendron, zone)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(lilacs, zone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(fruit tree, has physical part zone)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(lilacs, zone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(hydrangea, has physical part zone)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(lilacs, zone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(rhododendron, has physical part zone)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(lilacs, zone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(maple tree, has physical part zone)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(lilacs, zone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(fruit tree, has physical part zones)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(lilacs, zone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(hydrangea, has physical part zones)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(lilacs, zone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(hydrangea, zone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(hydrangea, zone)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(lilacs, zone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(rhododendron, zone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(rhododendron, zone)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(lilacs, zone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(hydrangea, has physical part zone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(hydrangea, has physical part zone)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(lilacs, zone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(fruit tree, has physical part zone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(fruit tree, has physical part zone)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(lilacs, zone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(hydrangea, has physical part zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(hydrangea, has physical part zones)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(lilacs, zone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(fruit tree, has physical part zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(fruit tree, has physical part zones)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(lilacs, zone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(rhododendron, has physical part zone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(rhododendron, has physical part zone)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(lilacs, zone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(maple tree, has physical part zone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(maple tree, has physical part zone)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(lilacs, zone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(lilacs, zone)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(lilacs, zone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(lilacs, zone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(lilacs, zone)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(lilacs, zone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(lilacs, zone)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(lilacs, zone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(rhododendron, zone)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(lilacs, zone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(hydrangea, zone)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(lilacs, zone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(hydrangea, has physical part zone)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(lilacs, zone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(fruit tree, has physical part zone)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(lilacs, zone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(rhododendron, has physical part zone)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(lilacs, zone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(hydrangea, has physical part zones)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(lilacs, zone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(fruit tree, has physical part zones)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(lilacs, zone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(maple tree, has physical part zone)