list: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.62
, description
Weight: 0.60
, date
Weight: 0.60
, record
Weight: 0.60
Siblings listing
Weight: 0.33
, calendar
Weight: 0.32
, preview
Weight: 0.31
, profile
Weight: 0.31
, shelf
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality better 0.94
is quality 0.91
be good for us 0.80
has quality joke 0.79
taste good 0.79
be excellent way treat 0.79
be with great price 0.78
sound good 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(description, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(list, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(date, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(list, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(record, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(list, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(record, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(list, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(date, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(list, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(record, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(list, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(date, be excellent way treat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(list, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(list, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(record, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(list, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(date, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(list, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(record, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(list, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(description, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(list, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(record, has quality better)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(list, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(date, be excellent way treat)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(list, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(date, be good for us)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(list, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(record, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(list, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(description, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(list, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(date, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(list, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(date, be excellent way treat)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(list, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(record, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(list, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(record, has quality better)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(list, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(date, be good for us)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(list, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(shelf, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(list, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(shelf, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(list, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(listing, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(list, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(calendar, has quality joke)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(list, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(profile, has quality better)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(list, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(calendar, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(list, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(preview, is quality)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(list, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(listing, be with great price)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(description, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(list, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(list, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(date, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(list, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(list, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(record, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(list, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(list, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(record, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(list, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(list, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(record, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(list, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(list, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(date, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(list, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(list, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(date, be excellent way treat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(list, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(list, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(list, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(calendar, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(calendar, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(list, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(shelf, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(shelf, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(list, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(profile, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(profile, has quality better)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(list, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(listing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(listing, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(list, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(shelf, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(shelf, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(list, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(preview, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(preview, is quality)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(list, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(listing, be with great price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(listing, be with great price)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(list, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(calendar, has quality joke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(calendar, has quality joke)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(list, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(list, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(list, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(list, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(list, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(list, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(list, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(list, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(record, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(list, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(record, has quality better)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(list, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(date, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(list, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(date, be excellent way treat)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(list, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(record, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(list, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(date, be good for us)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(list, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(description, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(list, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(preview, is quality)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(list, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(calendar, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(list, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(shelf, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(list, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(listing, be with great price)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(list, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(profile, has quality better)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(list, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(listing, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(list, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(shelf, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(list, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(calendar, has quality joke)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(list, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(record, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(list, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(date, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(list, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(record, has quality better)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(list, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(record, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(list, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(description, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(list, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(date, be excellent way treat)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(list, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(date, be good for us)