date: be good for us

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents record
Weight: 0.64
, evidence
Weight: 0.63
, tool
Weight: 0.61
, parameter
Weight: 0.61
Siblings list
Weight: 0.60
, appointment
Weight: 0.59
, beginning
Weight: 0.59
, may
Weight: 0.58
, december
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for us 1.00
be important to us 0.93
is great 0.84
has quality good 0.80
be excellent way treat 0.79
is good idea 0.79
be great time visit 0.77
be like imageoptin 0.77
come up in excel 0.77
be like imageoptin necessary 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(tool, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(date, be good for us)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(date, be good for us)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(evidence, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(date, be good for us)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(record, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(date, be good for us)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(tool, be like imageoptin necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(date, be good for us)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(date, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(record, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(date, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(tool, be like imageoptin necessary)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(date, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(evidence, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(date, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(tool, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(date, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(tool, is great)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(date, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(tool, be like imageoptin necessary)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(date, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(tool, is great)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(date, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(evidence, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(date, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(date, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(record, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(date, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(list, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(date, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(december, be great time visit)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(tool, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(date, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(date, be good for us)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(date, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(date, be good for us)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(evidence, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(date, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(date, be good for us)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(record, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(date, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(date, be good for us)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(tool, be like imageoptin necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(date, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(date, be good for us)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(date, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(december, be great time visit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(december, be great time visit)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(date, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(list, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(list, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(date, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(date, be good for us)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(date, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(date, be important to us)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(date, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(date, be important to us)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(date, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(date, be important to us)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(date, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(date, be excellent way treat)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(date, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(date, be important to us)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(date, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(date, has quality good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(date, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(date, be excellent way treat)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(date, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(date, come up in excel)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(date, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(date, be excellent way treat)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(date, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(date, be excellent way treat)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(date, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(date, come up in excel)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(date, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(date, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(date, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(date, come up in excel)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(date, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(date, come up in excel)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(date, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(date, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(date, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(date, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(date, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(date, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(date, be good for us)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(date, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(date, be good for us)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(date, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(record, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(date, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(tool, be like imageoptin necessary)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(date, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(evidence, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(date, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tool, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(date, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(tool, is great)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(date, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(december, be great time visit)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(date, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(list, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(date, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(record, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(date, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(tool, be like imageoptin necessary)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(date, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(evidence, has quality good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(date, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tool, has quality good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(date, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(tool, is great)