date: be excellent way treat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents record
Weight: 0.64
, evidence
Weight: 0.63
, tool
Weight: 0.61
, parameter
Weight: 0.61
Siblings list
Weight: 0.60
, appointment
Weight: 0.59
, beginning
Weight: 0.59
, may
Weight: 0.58
, december
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
be excellent way treat 1.00
be good for us 0.79
is great 0.79
has quality good 0.79
taste good 0.76
is best 0.76
has quality better 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(tool, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(date, be excellent way treat)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(date, be excellent way treat)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(evidence, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(date, be excellent way treat)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(tool, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(date, be excellent way treat)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(record, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(date, be excellent way treat)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(record, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(date, be excellent way treat)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(date, be excellent way treat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(record, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(date, be excellent way treat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(record, has quality better)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(date, be excellent way treat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(evidence, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(date, be excellent way treat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(tool, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(date, be excellent way treat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(tool, is great)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(date, be excellent way treat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(tool, is best)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(date, be excellent way treat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(evidence, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(date, be excellent way treat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(tool, is great)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(date, be excellent way treat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(tool, is best)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(date, be excellent way treat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(date, be excellent way treat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(record, has quality good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(date, be excellent way treat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(record, has quality better)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(date, be excellent way treat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(list, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(tool, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(date, be excellent way treat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(date, be excellent way treat)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(date, be excellent way treat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(date, be excellent way treat)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(evidence, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(date, be excellent way treat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(date, be excellent way treat)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(tool, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(date, be excellent way treat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(date, be excellent way treat)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(record, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(date, be excellent way treat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(date, be excellent way treat)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(record, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(date, be excellent way treat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(date, be excellent way treat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(date, be excellent way treat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(list, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(list, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(date, be excellent way treat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(date, be excellent way treat)

Similarity expansion

0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(date, be excellent way treat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(date, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(date, be excellent way treat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(date, be good for us)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(date, be excellent way treat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(date, be good for us)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(date, be excellent way treat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(date, be good for us)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(date, be excellent way treat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(date, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(date, be excellent way treat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(date, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(date, be excellent way treat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(date, be good for us)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(date, be excellent way treat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(date, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(date, be excellent way treat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(date, be excellent way treat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(date, be excellent way treat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(date, be excellent way treat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(date, be excellent way treat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(date, be excellent way treat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(record, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(date, be excellent way treat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(record, has quality better)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(date, be excellent way treat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(evidence, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(date, be excellent way treat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tool, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(date, be excellent way treat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(tool, is great)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(date, be excellent way treat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(tool, is best)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(date, be excellent way treat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(list, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(date, be excellent way treat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(record, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(date, be excellent way treat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(record, has quality better)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(date, be excellent way treat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(evidence, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(date, be excellent way treat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tool, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(date, be excellent way treat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(tool, is great)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(date, be excellent way treat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(tool, is best)