listening: be in class good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.56
, time
Weight: 0.54
, experience
Weight: 0.54
, activity
Weight: 0.52
Siblings loud music
Weight: 0.34
, talking
Weight: 0.34
, living thing
Weight: 0.33
, communicating
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in class good 1.00
is high good 0.78
has quality good 0.76
feel good 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(time, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(listening, be in class good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(experience, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(listening, be in class good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(listening, be in class good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(experience, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(listening, be in class good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(time, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(listening, be in class good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(experience, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(listening, be in class good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(time, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(listening, be in class good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(loud music, feel good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(listening, be in class good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(communicating, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(listening, be in class good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(talking, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(time, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(listening, be in class good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(listening, be in class good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(experience, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(listening, be in class good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(listening, be in class good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(listening, be in class good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(talking, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(talking, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(listening, be in class good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(communicating, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(communicating, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(listening, be in class good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(loud music, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(loud music, feel good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(listening, be in class good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(listening, be in class good)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(listening, be in class good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(listening, is high good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(listening, be in class good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(listening, is high good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(listening, be in class good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(listening, has quality good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(listening, be in class good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(listening, has quality good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(listening, be in class good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(listening, feel good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(listening, be in class good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(listening, feel good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(listening, be in class good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(listening, is high good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(listening, be in class good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(listening, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(listening, be in class good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(listening, feel good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(listening, be in class good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(listening, is high good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(listening, be in class good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(listening, feel good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(listening, be in class good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(listening, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(listening, be in class good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(listening, be in class good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(listening, be in class good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(listening, be in class good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(listening, be in class good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(listening, be in class good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(experience, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(listening, be in class good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(time, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(listening, be in class good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(loud music, feel good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(listening, be in class good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(talking, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(listening, be in class good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(communicating, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(listening, be in class good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(experience, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(listening, be in class good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(time, has quality good)