litter: is environmental issue

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.56
, garbage
Weight: 0.56
, item
Weight: 0.55
, problem
Weight: 0.54
Siblings fishing line
Weight: 0.61
, trash bag
Weight: 0.34
, trash can
Weight: 0.34
, trash
Weight: 0.34
, garbage can
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is environmental issue 1.00
is environmental problem 0.93
is environmental 0.92
is issue 0.83
regard cross cultural issues resolved in workplace 0.77
regard cross cultural issues resolved 0.75
regard cross cultural issues 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(problem, regard cross cultural issues resolved in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(litter, is environmental issue)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(litter, is environmental issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(problem, regard cross cultural issues resolved in workplace)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(litter, is environmental issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(problem, regard cross cultural issues resolved in workplace)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(litter, is environmental issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(trash, is issue)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(problem, regard cross cultural issues resolved in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(litter, is environmental issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(litter, is environmental issue)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(litter, is environmental issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(trash, is issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(trash, is issue)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(litter, is environmental issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(litter, is environmental issue)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(litter, is environmental issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(litter, is issue)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(litter, is environmental issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(litter, is issue)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(litter, is environmental issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(litter, is environmental)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(litter, is environmental issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(litter, is environmental problem)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(litter, is environmental issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(litter, is issue)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(litter, is environmental issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(litter, is environmental)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(litter, is environmental issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(litter, is issue)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(litter, is environmental issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(litter, is environmental)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(litter, is environmental issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(litter, is environmental problem)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(litter, is environmental issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(litter, is environmental problem)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(litter, is environmental issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(litter, is environmental)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(litter, is environmental issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(litter, is environmental problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(litter, is environmental issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(litter, is environmental issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(litter, is environmental issue)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(litter, is environmental issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(litter, is environmental issue)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(litter, is environmental issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(problem, regard cross cultural issues resolved in workplace)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(litter, is environmental issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(trash, is issue)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(litter, is environmental issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(problem, regard cross cultural issues resolved in workplace)