liver: biopsy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tissue
Weight: 0.64
, organ
Weight: 0.62
, kidney
Weight: 0.62
, complication
Weight: 0.61
, gland
Weight: 0.59
Siblings cirrhosis
Weight: 0.61
, liver cancer
Weight: 0.38
, bone tissue
Weight: 0.37
, bone marrow
Weight: 0.37
, adrenal gland
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
biopsy 1.00
complication of is biopsy 0.93
be removed in loop electrosurgical excision procedure 0.78
be called retroperitoneal 0.78
is retroperitoneal 0.78
ultrasound 0.77
be said retroperitoneal 0.77
be removed in loop excision procedure 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(tissue, be removed in loop electrosurgical excision procedure)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(liver, biopsy)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(kidney, be said retroperitoneal)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(liver, biopsy)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(kidney, ultrasound)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(liver, biopsy)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(liver, biopsy)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(kidney, ultrasound)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(liver, biopsy)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(kidney, be said retroperitoneal)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(liver, biopsy)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(tissue, be removed in loop electrosurgical excision procedure)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(liver, biopsy)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(kidney, ultrasound)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(liver, biopsy)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(tissue, be removed in loop electrosurgical excision procedure)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(liver, biopsy)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(kidney, be said retroperitoneal)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(tissue, be removed in loop electrosurgical excision procedure)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(liver, biopsy)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(liver, biopsy)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(kidney, be said retroperitoneal)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(liver, biopsy)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(liver, biopsy)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(kidney, ultrasound)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(liver, biopsy)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(liver, biopsy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(liver, biopsy)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(liver, biopsy)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(liver, biopsy)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(liver, complication of is biopsy)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(liver, biopsy)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(liver, complication of is biopsy)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(liver, biopsy)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(liver, complication of is biopsy)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(liver, biopsy)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(liver, complication of is biopsy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(liver, biopsy)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(liver, biopsy)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(liver, biopsy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(liver, biopsy)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(liver, biopsy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(liver, biopsy)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(kidney, ultrasound)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(liver, biopsy)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(kidney, be said retroperitoneal)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(liver, biopsy)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(tissue, be removed in loop electrosurgical excision procedure)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(liver, biopsy)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(kidney, ultrasound)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(liver, biopsy)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(kidney, be said retroperitoneal)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(liver, biopsy)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(tissue, be removed in loop electrosurgical excision procedure)