liver: complication of is biopsy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tissue
Weight: 0.64
, organ
Weight: 0.62
, kidney
Weight: 0.62
, complication
Weight: 0.61
, gland
Weight: 0.59
Siblings cirrhosis
Weight: 0.61
, liver cancer
Weight: 0.38
, bone tissue
Weight: 0.37
, bone marrow
Weight: 0.37
, adrenal gland
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
complication of is biopsy 1.00
biopsy 0.93
complication of is failure 0.83
is retroperitoneal 0.81
be called retroperitoneal 0.81
be said retroperitoneal 0.80
be removed in loop electrosurgical excision procedure 0.78
be removed in loop excision procedure 0.78
have cyst do 0.78
fail after heart surgery 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(tissue, be removed in loop electrosurgical excision procedure)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(liver, complication of is biopsy)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(kidney, be said retroperitoneal)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(liver, complication of is biopsy)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(liver, complication of is biopsy)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(kidney, be said retroperitoneal)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(liver, complication of is biopsy)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(tissue, be removed in loop electrosurgical excision procedure)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(liver, complication of is biopsy)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(tissue, be removed in loop electrosurgical excision procedure)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(liver, complication of is biopsy)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(kidney, be said retroperitoneal)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(tissue, be removed in loop electrosurgical excision procedure)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(liver, complication of is biopsy)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(liver, complication of is biopsy)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(kidney, be said retroperitoneal)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(liver, complication of is biopsy)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(liver, complication of is biopsy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(liver, complication of is biopsy)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(liver, complication of is biopsy)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(liver, complication of is biopsy)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(liver, biopsy)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(liver, complication of is biopsy)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(liver, biopsy)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(liver, complication of is biopsy)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(liver, biopsy)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(liver, complication of is biopsy)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(liver, complication of is failure)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(liver, complication of is biopsy)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(liver, complication of is failure)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(liver, complication of is biopsy)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(liver, complication of is failure)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(liver, complication of is biopsy)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(liver, complication of is failure)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(liver, complication of is biopsy)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(liver, biopsy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(liver, complication of is biopsy)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(liver, complication of is biopsy)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(liver, complication of is biopsy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(liver, complication of is biopsy)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(liver, complication of is biopsy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(liver, complication of is biopsy)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(kidney, be said retroperitoneal)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(liver, complication of is biopsy)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(tissue, be removed in loop electrosurgical excision procedure)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(liver, complication of is biopsy)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(kidney, be said retroperitoneal)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(liver, complication of is biopsy)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(tissue, be removed in loop electrosurgical excision procedure)