llama: be called llamas

Related concepts

Parents	animal Weight: 0.77 , creature Weight: 0.62 , species Weight: 0.60 , sheep Weight: 0.57 , thing Weight: 0.55
Siblings	alpaca Weight: 0.39 , mountain goat Weight: 0.39 , prairie dog Weight: 0.38 , goat Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be called llamas	1.00
were called llamas	0.99
is llama	0.86
be better than alpacas	0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(llama, be called llamas) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(alpaca, is llama)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(llama, be called llamas) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(alpaca, is llama) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Plausible(alpaca, is llama)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(llama, be called llamas) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Salient(llama, be called llamas)

Similarity expansion

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(llama, be called llamas) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Typical(llama, is llama)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(llama, be called llamas) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(llama, were called llamas)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(llama, be called llamas) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Plausible(llama, is llama)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(llama, be called llamas) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(llama, were called llamas)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.71

Salient(llama, be called llamas) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Salient(llama, were called llamas)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.71

Salient(llama, be called llamas) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Salient(llama, is llama)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.50

Remarkable(llama, be called llamas) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(llama, were called llamas)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(llama, be called llamas) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(llama, be better than alpacas)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(llama, be called llamas) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(llama, be better than alpacas)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.71

Salient(llama, be called llamas) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Salient(llama, be better than alpacas)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.50

Remarkable(llama, be called llamas) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(llama, be better than alpacas)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.50

Remarkable(llama, be called llamas) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(llama, is llama)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.71

Salient(llama, be called llamas) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(llama, be called llamas) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(llama, be called llamas)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(llama, be called llamas) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(llama, be called llamas)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(llama, be called llamas) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Typical(alpaca, is llama)