logic: is art

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents discipline
Weight: 0.65
, concept
Weight: 0.64
, factor
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.60
Siblings boolean algebra
Weight: 0.63
, point
Weight: 0.63
, prolog
Weight: 0.49
, multiplexer
Weight: 0.48
, theory
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is art 1.00
be considered art 0.93
art of reasoning 0.80
be considered art of reasoning 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(logic, is art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(logic, is art)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(logic, is art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(logic, be considered art)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(logic, is art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(logic, be considered art)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(logic, is art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(logic, be considered art)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(logic, is art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(logic, art of reasoning)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(logic, is art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(logic, be considered art)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(logic, is art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(logic, be considered art of reasoning)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(logic, is art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(logic, art of reasoning)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(logic, is art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(logic, be considered art of reasoning)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(logic, is art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(logic, be considered art of reasoning)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(logic, is art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(logic, art of reasoning)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(logic, is art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(logic, be considered art of reasoning)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(logic, is art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(logic, art of reasoning)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(logic, is art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(logic, is art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(logic, is art)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(logic, is art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(logic, is art)