# logic: be considered art

from Quasimodo

## Related concepts

 Parents disciplineWeight: 0.65, conceptWeight: 0.64, factorWeight: 0.60, thingWeight: 0.60 Siblings boolean algebraWeight: 0.63, pointWeight: 0.63, prologWeight: 0.49, multiplexerWeight: 0.48, theoryWeight: 0.35

## Related properties

 Similarity Property be considered art 1.00 is art 0.93 be considered art of reasoning 0.85 be considered science 0.79 art of reasoning 0.78

## Clauses

### Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(logic, be considered art)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(logic, be considered art)

### Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(logic, be considered art)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(logic, is art)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(logic, be considered art)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(logic, be considered art of reasoning)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(logic, be considered art)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(logic, is art)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(logic, be considered art)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(logic, art of reasoning)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(logic, be considered art)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(logic, be considered science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(logic, be considered art)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(logic, be considered art of reasoning)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(logic, be considered art)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(logic, be considered art of reasoning)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(logic, be considered art)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(logic, is art)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(logic, be considered art)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(logic, art of reasoning)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(logic, be considered art)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(logic, be considered science)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(logic, be considered art)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(logic, is art)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(logic, be considered art)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(logic, art of reasoning)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(logic, be considered art)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(logic, be considered art of reasoning)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(logic, be considered art)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(logic, be considered science)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(logic, be considered art)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(logic, art of reasoning)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(logic, be considered art)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(logic, be considered science)

### Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(logic, be considered art)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(logic, be considered art)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(logic, be considered art)

### Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(logic, be considered art)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(logic, be considered art)