logic: is useful

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents discipline
Weight: 0.65
, concept
Weight: 0.64
, factor
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.60
Siblings boolean algebra
Weight: 0.63
, point
Weight: 0.63
, prolog
Weight: 0.49
, multiplexer
Weight: 0.48
, theory
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is useful 1.00
be useful 0.99
be helpful in life 0.86
be helpful in everyday life 0.80
is problematic 0.77
be effective tool in reasoning 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(concept, is useful)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(logic, is useful)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(factor, be useful)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(logic, is useful)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(logic, is useful)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(concept, is useful)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(logic, is useful)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(factor, be useful)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(logic, is useful)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(factor, be useful)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(logic, is useful)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(concept, is useful)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(logic, is useful)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(theory, is useful)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(concept, is useful)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(logic, is useful)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(logic, is useful)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(factor, be useful)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(logic, is useful)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(logic, is useful)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(logic, is useful)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(theory, is useful)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(theory, is useful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(logic, is useful)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(logic, is useful)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(logic, is useful)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(logic, be useful)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(logic, is useful)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(logic, be useful)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(logic, is useful)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(logic, be helpful in life)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(logic, is useful)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(logic, be helpful in everyday life)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(logic, is useful)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(logic, is problematic)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(logic, is useful)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(logic, be effective tool in reasoning)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(logic, is useful)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(logic, be effective tool in reasoning)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(logic, is useful)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(logic, be useful)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(logic, is useful)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(logic, be effective tool in reasoning)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(logic, is useful)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(logic, is problematic)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(logic, is useful)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(logic, be helpful in life)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(logic, is useful)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(logic, be effective tool in reasoning)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(logic, is useful)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(logic, be helpful in everyday life)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(logic, is useful)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(logic, is problematic)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(logic, is useful)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(logic, is problematic)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(logic, is useful)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(logic, be useful)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(logic, is useful)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(logic, be helpful in life)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(logic, is useful)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(logic, be helpful in everyday life)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(logic, is useful)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(logic, be helpful in everyday life)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(logic, is useful)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(logic, be helpful in life)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(logic, is useful)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(logic, is useful)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(logic, is useful)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(logic, is useful)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(logic, is useful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(logic, is useful)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(concept, is useful)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(logic, is useful)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(factor, be useful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(logic, is useful)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(theory, is useful)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(logic, is useful)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(concept, is useful)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(logic, is useful)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(factor, be useful)