loss: be on sale

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents disappointment
Weight: 0.64
, gain
Weight: 0.61
, injury
Weight: 0.60
, punishment
Weight: 0.59
Siblings absorption
Weight: 0.59
, net
Weight: 0.58
, lost
Weight: 0.58
, sack
Weight: 0.58
, departure
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
be on sale 1.00
be on sale added 0.94
be on sale of asset 0.88
be on sale of asset added 0.85
be on sale of fixed asset 0.83
be on sale of fixed asset added 0.81
be on sale of equipment cash flows 0.79
be on sale subtracted 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(gain, be on sale of equipment cash flows) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(loss, be on sale)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(gain, be on sale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(loss, be on sale)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(gain, be on sale subtracted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(loss, be on sale)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(loss, be on sale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(gain, be on sale)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(loss, be on sale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(gain, be on sale subtracted)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(loss, be on sale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(gain, be on sale of equipment cash flows)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(loss, be on sale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(gain, be on sale subtracted)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(loss, be on sale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(gain, be on sale)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(loss, be on sale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(gain, be on sale of equipment cash flows)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(gain, be on sale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(loss, be on sale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(loss, be on sale)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(gain, be on sale of equipment cash flows) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(loss, be on sale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(loss, be on sale)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(gain, be on sale subtracted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(loss, be on sale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(loss, be on sale)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(loss, be on sale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(loss, be on sale)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(loss, be on sale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(loss, be on sale added)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(loss, be on sale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(loss, be on sale added)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(loss, be on sale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(loss, be on sale added)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(loss, be on sale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(loss, be on sale added)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(loss, be on sale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(loss, be on sale of asset)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(loss, be on sale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(loss, be on sale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(loss, be on sale)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(loss, be on sale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(loss, be on sale)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(loss, be on sale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(gain, be on sale)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(loss, be on sale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(gain, be on sale subtracted)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(loss, be on sale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(gain, be on sale of equipment cash flows)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(loss, be on sale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(gain, be on sale)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(loss, be on sale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(gain, be on sale subtracted)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(loss, be on sale) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(gain, be on sale of equipment cash flows)