lunch: is best

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents meal
Weight: 0.67
, dinner
Weight: 0.63
, free time
Weight: 0.61
, hour
Weight: 0.58
, program
Weight: 0.58
Siblings breakfast
Weight: 0.37
, brunch
Weight: 0.37
, supper
Weight: 0.36
, salad
Weight: 0.36
, hamburger
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is best 1.00
is good for 0.80
is best meal 0.77
be best spent 0.77
has quality good 0.76
is favorite 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(dinner, is best meal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(lunch, is best)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(dinner, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(lunch, is best)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(meal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(lunch, is best)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(free time, be best spent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(lunch, is best)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(meal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(lunch, is best)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(lunch, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(meal, is good for)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(lunch, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(free time, be best spent)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(lunch, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(meal, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(lunch, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(dinner, is best meal)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(lunch, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(dinner, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(lunch, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(meal, is good for)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(lunch, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(dinner, is best meal)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(lunch, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(meal, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(lunch, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(dinner, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(lunch, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(free time, be best spent)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(lunch, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(lunch, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(salad, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(lunch, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(breakfast, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(lunch, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(supper, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(dinner, is best meal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(lunch, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(lunch, is best)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(dinner, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(lunch, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(lunch, is best)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(meal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(lunch, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(lunch, is best)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(meal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(lunch, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(lunch, is best)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(free time, be best spent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(lunch, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(lunch, is best)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(lunch, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(supper, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(supper, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(lunch, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(breakfast, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(breakfast, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(lunch, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(salad, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(lunch, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(hamburger, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(hamburger, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(lunch, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(lunch, is best)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(lunch, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(lunch, has quality good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(lunch, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(lunch, has quality good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(lunch, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(lunch, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(lunch, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(lunch, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(lunch, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(lunch, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(lunch, is best)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(lunch, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(lunch, is best)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(lunch, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(free time, be best spent)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(lunch, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(meal, is good for)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(lunch, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(meal, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(lunch, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(dinner, has quality good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(lunch, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(dinner, is best meal)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(lunch, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(supper, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(lunch, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(breakfast, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(lunch, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(salad, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(lunch, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(hamburger, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(lunch, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(meal, is good for)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(lunch, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(free time, be best spent)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(lunch, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(dinner, is best meal)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(lunch, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(meal, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(lunch, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(dinner, has quality good)