mailman: wear hats

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents service
Weight: 0.44
, man
Weight: 0.44
, thing
Weight: 0.43
, assassin
Weight: 0.41
, person
Weight: 0.40
Siblings postman
Weight: 0.33
, policeman
Weight: 0.31
, old man
Weight: 0.31
, young man
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear hats 1.00
wear safari hats 0.88
wear gloves 0.87
wear shorts 0.82
wear pith helmets 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(mailman, wear hats)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(policeman, wear hats)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(mailman, wear hats)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(postman, wear shorts)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(mailman, wear hats)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(policeman, wear hats)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(policeman, wear hats)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(mailman, wear hats)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(postman, wear shorts)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(postman, wear shorts)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(mailman, wear hats)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(mailman, wear hats)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(mailman, wear hats)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(mailman, wear safari hats)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(mailman, wear hats)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(mailman, wear gloves)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(mailman, wear hats)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mailman, wear shorts)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(mailman, wear hats)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(mailman, wear safari hats)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(mailman, wear hats)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(mailman, wear pith helmets)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(mailman, wear hats)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(mailman, wear safari hats)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(mailman, wear hats)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(mailman, wear gloves)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(mailman, wear hats)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(mailman, wear shorts)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(mailman, wear hats)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(mailman, wear gloves)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(mailman, wear hats)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(mailman, wear pith helmets)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(mailman, wear hats)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(mailman, wear safari hats)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(mailman, wear hats)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(mailman, wear gloves)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(mailman, wear hats)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(mailman, wear shorts)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(mailman, wear hats)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(mailman, wear pith helmets)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(mailman, wear hats)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(mailman, wear pith helmets)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(mailman, wear hats)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(mailman, wear shorts)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(mailman, wear hats)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(mailman, wear hats)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(mailman, wear hats)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(mailman, wear hats)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(mailman, wear hats)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(mailman, wear hats)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(policeman, wear hats)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(mailman, wear hats)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(postman, wear shorts)