mailman: wear pith helmets

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents service
Weight: 0.44
, man
Weight: 0.44
, thing
Weight: 0.43
, assassin
Weight: 0.41
, person
Weight: 0.40
Siblings postman
Weight: 0.33
, policeman
Weight: 0.31
, old man
Weight: 0.31
, young man
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear pith helmets 1.00
wear gloves 0.79
wear hats 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(mailman, wear pith helmets)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(policeman, wear hats)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(mailman, wear pith helmets)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(policeman, wear hats)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(policeman, wear hats)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(mailman, wear pith helmets)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(mailman, wear pith helmets)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(mailman, wear pith helmets)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(mailman, wear hats)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(mailman, wear pith helmets)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(mailman, wear hats)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(mailman, wear pith helmets)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(mailman, wear hats)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(mailman, wear pith helmets)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(mailman, wear gloves)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(mailman, wear pith helmets)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(mailman, wear gloves)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(mailman, wear pith helmets)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(mailman, wear gloves)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(mailman, wear pith helmets)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(mailman, wear gloves)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(mailman, wear pith helmets)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(mailman, wear hats)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(mailman, wear pith helmets)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(mailman, wear pith helmets)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(mailman, wear pith helmets)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(mailman, wear pith helmets)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(mailman, wear pith helmets)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(mailman, wear pith helmets)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(policeman, wear hats)