mall: is food good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents shopping center
Weight: 0.74
, location
Weight: 0.67
, area
Weight: 0.62
, real estate
Weight: 0.60
Siblings shopping mall
Weight: 0.40
, department store
Weight: 0.38
, convenience store
Weight: 0.37
, food store
Weight: 0.36
, plaza
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is food good 1.00
is food 0.93
is chinese food good 0.86
is chinese food 0.81
has quality good 0.78
be good for business 0.76
is nutrition 0.76
has quality bad 0.76
is good job 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(location, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(mall, is food good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(real estate, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(mall, is food good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(real estate, is good job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(mall, is food good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(mall, is food good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(real estate, is good job)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(mall, is food good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(real estate, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(mall, is food good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(location, be good for business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mall, is food good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(location, be good for business)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mall, is food good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(real estate, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mall, is food good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(real estate, is good job)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mall, is food good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(food store, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(location, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(mall, is food good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(mall, is food good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(real estate, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(mall, is food good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(mall, is food good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(real estate, is good job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(mall, is food good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(mall, is food good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(mall, is food good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(food store, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(food store, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(mall, is food good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(mall, is food good)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(mall, is food good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(mall, is food)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(mall, is food good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(mall, is food)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(mall, is food good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(mall, is food)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(mall, is food good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(mall, is chinese food good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(mall, is food good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(mall, is chinese food good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(mall, is food good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(mall, is chinese food good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(mall, is food good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(mall, is chinese food good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(mall, is food good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(mall, is chinese food)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(mall, is food good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(mall, is nutrition)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(mall, is food good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(mall, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(mall, is food good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(mall, is chinese food)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(mall, is food good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(mall, is chinese food)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(mall, is food good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(mall, is nutrition)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(mall, is food good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(mall, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(mall, is food good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(mall, is chinese food)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(mall, is food good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(mall, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(mall, is food good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(mall, is food)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(mall, is food good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(mall, is nutrition)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(mall, is food good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(mall, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(mall, is food good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(mall, is nutrition)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(mall, is food good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(mall, is food good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mall, is food good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(mall, is food good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(mall, is food good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mall, is food good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(real estate, is good job)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mall, is food good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(real estate, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mall, is food good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(location, be good for business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mall, is food good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(food store, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(mall, is food good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(real estate, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(mall, is food good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(real estate, is good job)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(mall, is food good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(location, be good for business)