mammal: be at forest

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wild animal
Weight: 0.65
, pet
Weight: 0.63
, creature
Weight: 0.59
, animal
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.55
Siblings whale
Weight: 0.78
, blue whale
Weight: 0.76
, humpback whale
Weight: 0.75
, dolphin
Weight: 0.75
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.75

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at forest 1.00
be at in forest 0.99
be find in forest 0.96
be defined as animal which live in forest 0.85
be at woodland 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(wild animal, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(mammal, be at forest)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(creature, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(mammal, be at forest)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(animal, be at in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(mammal, be at forest)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(wild animal, be defined as animal which live in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(mammal, be at forest)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(animal, be at woodland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(mammal, be at forest)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(mammal, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(animal, be at in forest)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(mammal, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(creature, be at forest)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(mammal, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(wild animal, be at forest)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(mammal, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(wild animal, be defined as animal which live in forest)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(mammal, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(animal, be at woodland)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(mammal, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(wild animal, be at forest)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(mammal, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(animal, be at in forest)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(mammal, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(creature, be at forest)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(mammal, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(animal, be at woodland)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(mammal, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(wild animal, be defined as animal which live in forest)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(wild animal, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(mammal, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(mammal, be at forest)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(creature, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(mammal, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(mammal, be at forest)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(animal, be at in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(mammal, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(mammal, be at forest)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(wild animal, be defined as animal which live in forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(mammal, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(mammal, be at forest)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(animal, be at woodland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(mammal, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(mammal, be at forest)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(mammal, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(mammal, be at forest)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(mammal, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(mammal, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(mammal, be at forest)

Typical implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(mammal, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(mammal, be at forest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(mammal, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(creature, be at forest)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(mammal, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(wild animal, be at forest)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(mammal, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(animal, be at in forest)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(mammal, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(wild animal, be defined as animal which live in forest)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(mammal, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(animal, be at woodland)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(mammal, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(creature, be at forest)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(mammal, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(wild animal, be at forest)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(mammal, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(animal, be at in forest)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(mammal, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(wild animal, be defined as animal which live in forest)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(mammal, be at forest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(animal, be at woodland)