man: commit crime

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents woman
Weight: 0.70
, soldier
Weight: 0.68
, politician
Weight: 0.67
, trooper
Weight: 0.66
Siblings old man
Weight: 0.88
, young man
Weight: 0.85
, young woman
Weight: 0.81
, policeman
Weight: 0.79
, nephew
Weight: 0.73

Related properties

Property Similarity
commit crime 1.00
be at crime scene 0.83
be at scene of crime 0.83
notice crime 0.82
commit genocide 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(man, commit crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(policeman, be at crime scene)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(man, commit crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(policeman, be at scene of crime)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(man, commit crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(policeman, notice crime)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(man, commit crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(policeman, notice crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(policeman, notice crime)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(man, commit crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(policeman, be at scene of crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(policeman, be at scene of crime)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(man, commit crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(policeman, be at crime scene) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(policeman, be at crime scene)

Salient implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(man, commit crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(man, commit crime)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(man, commit crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(man, commit genocide)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(man, commit crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(man, commit genocide)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(man, commit crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(man, commit genocide)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(man, commit crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(man, commit genocide)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(man, commit crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(man, commit crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(man, commit crime)

Typical implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(man, commit crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(man, commit crime)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(man, commit crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(policeman, be at crime scene)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(man, commit crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(policeman, be at scene of crime)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(man, commit crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(policeman, notice crime)