management: is concept

Property	Similarity
is concept	1.00
be considered concept	0.95
be considered as concept	0.92
be considered as multi-faceted concept	0.92
be considered multifaceted concept	0.85

0.78

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(management, is concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(management, be considered concept)

0.77

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(management, is concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(management, be considered as multi-faceted concept)

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(management, is concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(management, be considered as concept)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.06

Typical(management, is concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Typical(management, be considered as concept)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(management, is concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(management, be considered multifaceted concept)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.06

Typical(management, is concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Typical(management, be considered concept)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(management, is concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Plausible(management, be considered as concept)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(management, is concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Plausible(management, be considered concept)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.54

Salient(management, is concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Salient(management, be considered as concept)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.54

Salient(management, is concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Salient(management, be considered concept)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.54

Salient(management, is concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Salient(management, be considered as multi-faceted concept)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.54

Salient(management, is concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Salient(management, be considered multifaceted concept)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(management, is concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Plausible(management, be considered multifaceted concept)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(management, is concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(management, be considered as multi-faceted concept)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.06

Typical(management, is concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(management, be considered multifaceted concept)

0.14

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.06

Typical(management, is concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(management, be considered as multi-faceted concept)

Parents	industry Weight: 0.64 , solution Weight: 0.62 , variable Weight: 0.62 , business activity Weight: 0.62
Siblings	storage Weight: 0.59 , neo Weight: 0.38 , banking industry Weight: 0.34 , operating system Weight: 0.33 , internet service provider Weight: 0.33

management: is concept

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible