management: be considered as concept

Property	Similarity
be considered as concept	1.00
be considered as multi-faceted concept	1.00
be considered concept	0.99
is concept	0.92
be considered multifaceted concept	0.88
be considered as art	0.81
be considered as life	0.80
be considered as science	0.79
be called universally social process	0.78
be regarded as science	0.77

0.83

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(management, be considered as concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(management, be considered as multi-faceted concept)

0.81

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(management, be considered as concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(management, be considered concept)

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(management, be considered as concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(management, is concept)

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.08

Typical(management, be considered as concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(management, is concept)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(management, be considered as concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(management, be considered multifaceted concept)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.08

Typical(management, be considered as concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Typical(management, be considered concept)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(management, be considered as concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(management, be considered as art)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(management, be considered as concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(management, be called universally social process)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(management, be considered as concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(management, be considered as science)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.30

Plausible(management, be considered as concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Plausible(management, is concept)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(management, be considered as concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(management, be regarded as science)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.30

Plausible(management, be considered as concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Plausible(management, be considered concept)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.58

Salient(management, be considered as concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Salient(management, be considered concept)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.58

Salient(management, be considered as concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Salient(management, is concept)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.08

Typical(management, be considered as concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Typical(management, be considered as science)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.58

Salient(management, be considered as concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Salient(management, be considered as multi-faceted concept)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.58

Salient(management, be considered as concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Salient(management, be considered as art)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.58

Salient(management, be considered as concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Salient(management, be considered as science)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.58

Salient(management, be considered as concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Salient(management, be considered multifaceted concept)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.30

Plausible(management, be considered as concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Plausible(management, be considered as science)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.58

Salient(management, be considered as concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Salient(management, be regarded as science)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.30

Plausible(management, be considered as concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Plausible(management, be considered as art)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.58

Salient(management, be considered as concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Salient(management, be called universally social process)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.08

Typical(management, be considered as concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(management, be considered as art)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.30

Plausible(management, be considered as concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Plausible(management, be regarded as science)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.30

Plausible(management, be considered as concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Plausible(management, be considered multifaceted concept)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.08

Typical(management, be considered as concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Typical(management, be regarded as science)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.30

Plausible(management, be considered as concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(management, be called universally social process)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.30

Plausible(management, be considered as concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(management, be considered as multi-faceted concept)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.08

Typical(management, be considered as concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(management, be considered multifaceted concept)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.08

Typical(management, be considered as concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(management, be called universally social process)

0.16

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.08

Typical(management, be considered as concept) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(management, be considered as multi-faceted concept)

Parents	industry Weight: 0.64 , solution Weight: 0.62 , variable Weight: 0.62 , business activity Weight: 0.62
Siblings	storage Weight: 0.59 , neo Weight: 0.38 , banking industry Weight: 0.34 , operating system Weight: 0.33 , internet service provider Weight: 0.33

management: be considered as concept

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible